Home › Research › Drug development
A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to describe antisense oligonucleotide distribution after intrathecal administration
Monine M, Norris D, Wang Y, Nestorov I.. Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2021-05-15
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are promising therapeutic agents for a variety of neurodegenerative and neuromuscular disorders, e.g., Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), caused by genetic abnormalities or increased protein accumulation. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a challenge to the delivery of systemically administered ASOs to the relevant sites of action within the central nervous system (CNS). Intrathecal (IT) delivery, in which drugs are administered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, enables to bypass the BBB. Several IT-administered ASO therapeutics have already demonstrated clinical effect, e.g., nusinersen (SMA) and tofersen (ALS). Due to novelty of IT dosing for ASOs, very limited pharmacokinetic (PK) data is available and only a few modeling reports have been generated. The objective of this work is to advance fundamental understanding of whole-body distribution of IT-administered ASOs. We propose a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to describe the distribution along the neuroaxis based on PK data from non-human primate (NHP) studies. We aim to understand the key processes that drive and limit ASO access to the CNS target tissues. To elucidate the trade-off between parameter identifiability and physiological plausibility of the model, several alternative model structures were chosen and fitted to the NHP data. The model analysis of the NHP data led to important qualitative conclusions that can inform projection to human. In particular, the model predicts that the maximum total exposure in the CNS tissues, including the spinal cord and brain, is achieved within two days after the IT injection, and the maximum amount absorbed by the CNS tissues is about 4% of the administered IT dose. This amount greatly exceeds the CNS exposures delivered by systemic administration of ASOs. Clearance from the CNS is controlled by the rate of transfer from the CNS tissues back to CSF, whereas ASO degradation in tissues is very slow and can be neglected. The model also describes local differences in ASO concentration emerging along the spinal CSF canal. These local concentrations need to be taken into account when scaling the NHP model to human: due to the lengthier human spinal column, inhomogeneity along the spinal CSF may cause even higher gradients and delays potentially limiting ASO access to target CNS tissues.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Monine, M., Norris, D., Wang, Y., & Nestorov, I. (2021). A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to describe antisense oligonucleotide distribution after intrathecal administration. Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09761-0
Vancouver
Monine M, Norris D, Wang Y, Nestorov I. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to describe antisense oligonucleotide distribution after intrathecal administration. Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. 2021. doi:10.1007/s10928-021-09761-0. PMID: 33991294.
BibTeX
@article{monine2021-33991294,
author = {Monine, M. and Norris, D. and Wang, Y. and Nestorov, I.},
title = {{A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to describe antisense oligonucleotide distribution after intrathecal administration}},
journal = {Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1007/s10928-021-09761-0},
pmid = {33991294},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09761-0}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Several IT-administered ASO therapeutics have already demonstrated clinical effect, e.g., nusinersen (SMA) and tofersen (ALS).
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33991294) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “administration”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “administration”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.