Home › Research › Biomarkers
A New Frontier in CWD Detection: Antemortem Plasma Biomarkers and Behavioral Profiling in Transgenic Mouse Models
Seerley Nolan AL, McElroy SD, Mace AA, Grindeland Panter AL.. bioRxiv, 2026-08-10
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) that is confined to cervids (deer, moose, elk, and reindeer) but shares key properties with human neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s disease and frontal-temporal dementia. CWD and other TSEs are caused by the misfolded prion protein (PrP). Although the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers at all stages of disease progression is becoming exceedingly critical as CWD continues to increase in prevalence, accurate antemortem testing techniques are extremely limited. This study made use of cervidized transgenic mice (mice carrying the cervid PrP) that recapitulate CWD in various disease stages and investigated the utility of neurological biomarkers and neurobehavioral manifestations for CWD detection. Neurofilament light chain (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and total Tau (t-Tau) were assessed under the hypothesis that combined biomarker signatures might more reliably reflect CWD-related neurodegeneration and disease progression. Analyses at 90, 132, 174, and 230 days post-CWD inoculation show distinct biomarker elevation, with all three biomarkers significantly elevated in the CWD animals by 132 days post-inoculation. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that these three plasma biomarkers are useful not only for detecting CWD, but also for identifying it at early antemortem stages of disease. Novel phenotypes were also revealed by comprehensive phenotypic profiling, including rigid tail elevation, increased grip strength, and impaired coordination, to lend further support to plasma biomarker data indicating neurologic impairment associated with brain pathology. Ultimately, the goal is to improve antemortem, non-invasive CWD detection methods to enable earlier detection and assist with disease management.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Seerley Nolan, A. L., McElroy, S. D., Mace, A. A., & Grindeland Panter, A. L. (2026). A New Frontier in CWD Detection: Antemortem Plasma Biomarkers and Behavioral Profiling in Transgenic Mouse Models. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.04.742870
Vancouver
Seerley Nolan AL, McElroy SD, Mace AA, Grindeland Panter AL. A New Frontier in CWD Detection: Antemortem Plasma Biomarkers and Behavioral Profiling in Transgenic Mouse Models. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.08.04.742870.
BibTeX
@article{seerleynolan2026-6e1d26a2,
author = {Seerley Nolan, A. L. and McElroy, S. D. and Mace, A. A. and Grindeland Panter, A. L.},
title = {{A New Frontier in CWD Detection: Antemortem Plasma Biomarkers and Behavioral Profiling in Transgenic Mouse Models}},
journal = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.04.742870},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.04.742870}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Analyses at 90, 132, 174, and 230 days post-CWD inoculation show distinct biomarker elevation, with all three biomarkers significantly elevated in the CWD animals by 132 days post-inoculation.
- Novel phenotypes were also revealed by comprehensive phenotypic profiling, including rigid tail elevation, increased grip strength, and impaired coordination, to lend further support to plasma biomarker data indicating neurologic impairment associated with brain pathology.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “transgenic”) — scores zero |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 13 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100. |
| Total | 21 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “neurofilament”
697 studies in the library carry the topic tag “neurofilament”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 697 tagged studies.