31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
A number of context, implementation and mechanism of impact factors were identified, which might explain these results and may inform interpretation of the pending RCT main effect results. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A growing body of evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the human gut microbiota is associated with neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD) via neuroinflammatory processes across the microbiota-gut-brain axis. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Fine-mapping is commonly used to identify putative causal variants at genome-wide significant loci. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Previous post-mortem assessments of TREM2 expression and its association with brain pathologies have been limited by sample size. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 945 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study suggests that OA was associated with faster Aβ accumulation and higher Aβ-dependent future tau deposition in primary motor and somatosensory regions, providing novel insights into how OA increases the risk of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 374 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Passive immunotherapy in AD is largely dominated by anti-amyloid antibodies, which are more numerous and more advanced in the pipeline. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The comparable performance of the ADCS-ADL and A-IADL-Q supports the utility of the A-IADL-Q in early AD clinical trials. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 158 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative disease of the nervous system. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of 6256 participants (3402 women [54.4%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 61.7 [6.6] years), 510 received an all-cause dementia diagnosis within 17 years of baseline. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 766 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall, uptake was lower among men than among women (odds ratio [OR] 0·91 [95% CI 0·88-0·94]; p<0·0001), and higher among older age groups (1·48 [1·42-1·54] among those aged 65-69 years vs those aged 55-59 years; p<0·0001), groups with less deprivation (1·89 [1·76-2·04] for the most vs the least deprived areas; p<0·0001), individuals of Asian ethnicity (1·14 [1·09-1·20] vs White ethnicity; p<0·0001), and individuals who were former smokers (1·89 [1·83-1·95] vs current smokers; p<0·0001). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 488 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There is a need for blood biomarkers to detect individuals at different Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages because obtaining cerebrospinal fluid-based biomarkers is invasive and costly. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
IICV was associated with concurrent/baseline performance on several outcomes but did not modify associations between age and cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 235 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Bisecting N-acetylglucosamine correlated with tau levels (p < 0.0001). 4 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 233 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A 95% (347/366) concordance rate was noted between clinicians' patient selection and the test's intended use criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 366 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aducanumab is a novel disease-modifying anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) human monoclonal antibody specifically targeted to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Quality pharmacological treatment can improve survival in many types of cancer. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age-dependent neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of cognitive decline. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Huntington's Disease (HD) is a severely debilitating neurodegenerative disorder in which sufferers exhibit different combinations of movement disorders, dementia, and behavioral or psychiatric abnormalities. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This critical review explores the review material on physical activity combined with cognitive stimulation interventions in older adults with cognitive impairment and/or dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The combinations of hearing and proprioceptive impairment and hearing, vision, and proprioceptive impairment, were positively correlated with cDVR (β = 0.087 and p = 0.036, β = 0.110 and p = 0.018, respectively). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 174 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Twenty-five meta-analyses published between 2007 and 2021 were included. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias is a major public health burden-compounding over upcoming years due to longevity. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 30,097 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Evidence on the association between air pollution and dementia is accumulating but still inconclusive, and the potential effect modification by genetics is unclear. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 227,840 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A high-protein and alcohol dietary pattern was negatively associated with cortical thickness in the whole brain (Beta: -0.011; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.018 to -0.003), and with an Alzheimer's disease cortical thickness signature score (Beta: -0.013; 95% CI: -0.024 to -0.001). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 610 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The search generated 33 papers, which yielded 11 articles after screening. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events