Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Engaging 55 research staff across 25 sites and 3 physician-reviewers, this study is the first to demonstrate feasibility of a VANE as an efficient neurological examination model enabled by commonly used devices. 2 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Can objective measures of physical activity and sleep serve as early predictors of dementia among individuals with cognitive impairment?

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-15

The MCI group had the most surprising findings—although they were cognitively similar to the control group, they were less physically active than the AD group and had the worst sleep efficiency. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Spontaneous speech acoustics capture p-tau217/APOE-defined AD risk despite preserved cognition, supporting speech as a scalable, biologically grounded biomarker for preclinical AD risk stratification. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

In cognitively unimpaired older adults, associations between sleep disturbances and psycho-affective symptoms differ according to Aβ status. 2 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 131 Evidence: moderate

Frequency-Resolved Connectivity Graphs for EEG-Based Classification of Alzheimer and Frontotemporal Dementia

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-22

A bstract In this study, we build EEG based graph model that uses frequency-resolved connectivity features, with Coherence, phase locking value (PLV) and phase lag index (PLI) in five frequency bands as multi-dimensional edge features. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

DNA Methylation Concordance Between Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Human Brain Tissue in Neurodegenerative Diseases

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-09-24

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) brain tissue is a major archival resource, yet its suitability for high-density DNA methylation profiling is limited by fixation-induced DNA fragmentation and crosslinking. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Loss of TDP-43 function drives cryptic circular RNAs in neurodegenerative diseases

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-20

TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a key pathological hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and a critical regulator of RNA splicing. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Underlying histopathology features of white matter hyperintensities in vascular and neurodegenerative disorders: a systematic review

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-09-20

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a hallmark of cerebral small vessel disease, commonly seen in cognitively normal older adults and patients with neurodegenerative disorders, and are thought to reflect varying degrees of tissue damage. 2 key findings →

Participants: 45 Evidence: low

Distinguishing Parkinsonian Disorders and Cognitive Disorder Subtypes Using Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-09-16

Arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI provides a noninvasive measure of cerebral perfusion, raising the possibility of distinguishing Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy) and of separating the associated cognitive disorders, PD dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), from Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Selective vulnerability and resilience of thalamic neuronal populations in Frontotemporal Dementia

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-09-11

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) caused by progranulin (GRN) mutations is associated with pronounced thalamic degeneration, yet the cellular basis of selective thalamic vulnerability remains poorly understood. 3 key findings →

Participants: 92 Evidence: low

Specification dependence of EEG theta/alpha ratio associations with cognitive impairment: a multiverse analysis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-08

The theta/alpha ratio is a promising but specification-dependent marker of cognitive impairment, contingent particularly on ICA and spectral power quantification. 4 key findings →

Participants: 49 Evidence: low

Face Processing Impairments in Dementia Syndromes: A Systematic Review

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. PsyArXiv 2026-09-06

Face processing abilities are critical for social interaction, yet impairments are common across dementia syndromes and constitute a core diagnostic feature of some neurocognitive disorders. 5 key findings →

Design: systematic review Participants: 3,810 Evidence: high

Cerebrospinal fluid YWHAG:NPTX2 ratio predicts clinical severity and future phenoconversion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-31

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a common cause of early-onset dementias marked by progressive declines in behavior, cognition, and/or movement. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Disease-specific tangle immunophenotypes distinguish hippocampal vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease dementia

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-19

Structured Abstract INTRODUCTION Tau pathology typically occurs in Alzheimeŕs disease (AD), however is also frequently present in Parkinsońs disease dementia (PDD) and Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), yet its disease-specific signature is unclear. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

APP Dosage and Extracellular Domain Variants Drive Distinct Defects in Neurogenesis modeled in Down Syndrome iPS cells

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-06

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is heavily studied as the source of amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), however, the complex functions of APP remain poorly understood, as does the impact of APP dosage on neurodevelopment. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Trisomy 21 cerebral organoids exhibit Alzheimer’s disease amyloid and apolipoprotein E co-pathologies

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-07-07

Adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain pathology by age 40 due to triplication of the Amyloid Precursor Protein ( APP ) gene on chromosome 21. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Sodium channel blockers are associated with reduced dementia risk in late-onset unexplained epilepsy

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-05-22

Late-onset unexplained epilepsy is a potential harbinger of dementia, likely driven by network hyperexcitability that facilitates amyloid-β release and tau propagation. 3 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed