Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for qualitative analysis, but strong language performance does not guarantee strong interpretation when meaning depends on method and context. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

BackgroundTuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in TSC1 or TSC2, resulting in chronic hyperactivation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. 5 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

These findings show that model-based, adaptive assessments can support high-frequency, remote detection and scalable longitudinal monitoring of early memory decline, providing a new way to assess memory decline trajectories in healthy aging and dementia. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 24 Evidence: moderate

Clonal Haematopoiesis Tracks Alzheimer's-like Cortical Atrophy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-12

BackgroundClonal haematopoiesis (CH), the age-related expansion of mutated blood stem cells, is detectable in around 10% of people in their seventies, rises steeply with age, and is associated with several diseases. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,091 Evidence: moderate

BackgroundNon-pharmacological interventions may enhance motor-cognitive integration in prodromal Alzheimers disease (pAD). 5 key findings →

Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 68 Evidence: high

Cognition in Whitehall II 'SuperAgers': An Analysis of Dementia Risk Factors

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-14

Higher education (OR = 1.23, SE = 0.05, 95% CI = [1.10, 1.36], p < 0.001), female sex (OR = 1.30, SE = 0.09, 95% CI = [1.10, 1.55], p = 0.003), and lower age (OR = 0.67, SE = 0.04, 95% CI = [0.61, 0.73], p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of SuperAger status. 5 key findings →

Participants: 3,513 Evidence: moderate

Diagnostic Value of Large Language Model-Extracted Gross Brain Findings in Neurodegenerative Diseases

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-14

Gross brain findings help guide differential diagnosis, but their diagnostic value across major neurodegenerative diseases remains incompletely characterized. 5 key findings →

Participants: 5,613 Evidence: low

ObjectivesSubjective word-finding complaints (SWFC) are among the most frequent cognitive complaints in cognitively unimpaired older adults (CU). 3 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Plasma proteomics reveals stage-dependent biological remodelling in Alzheimer's disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-14

Plasma biomarkers of amyloid-associated tau phosphorylation (T1) and established tau proteinopathy (T2) can approximate Alzheimers disease stage, but whether plasma-defined stages correspond to broader biological states is unknown. 1 key finding →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,035 Evidence: moderate

Pathway-specific polygenic risk scores reveal underlying mechanisms of cerebral small vessel disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-14

White matter hyperintensities (WMH), a key MRI-marker of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), are common in older adults and associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. 5 key findings →

Participants: 46,944 Evidence: moderate

Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Across the Human Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-14

BackgroundBone marrow megakaryocytes, the primary source of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the blood, secrete BDNF-packed platelets into the bloodstream. 3 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high

Late Life Learning, Cognition, and Aging: A Longitudinal study of middle and older-aged adults in Beirut, Lebanon (3LC study)

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-15

BackgroundLebanon is undergoing substantial demographic and social change, with older adults comprising approximately 10% of the population. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,871 Evidence: moderate

The APOL1 protective M1 modifier occurs exclusively with the KIK protein haplotype to suppress channel conductance

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-15

IntroductionGenetic studies have shown the APOL1 variant p.N264K, also called M1, is associated with markedly lower kidney disease risk when co-inherited with the G2-risk allele. 4 key findings →

Participants: 40,909 Evidence: low

Development and External Validation of a Plasma p-tau217-Based Model for MCI-to-Dementia Progression

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-16

--Clinical trajectories after a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vary widely, so prognostic models must account for both the timing of subsequent diagnoses and unequal follow-up. 2 key findings →

Participants: 401 Evidence: moderate

It remains unclear whether the combined conditions confer an excess risk of hypoglycaemia-related hospitalisation beyond the risks associated with either condition alone. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 329,566 Evidence: moderate

Accelerometer-Derived Relative Amplitude and Midlife Cognition: A Cross-Sectional Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-16

ImportanceLower relative amplitude of the rest-activity pattern has been associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia in older adults, but its relationship with domain-specific cognitive performance during midlife is less well characterized. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 851 Evidence: moderate

Feasibility of remote self-administered cognitive assessment in an Alzheimer's disease treatment clinic

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-16

IntroductionRemote cognitive assessments offer an accessible, scalable way to support clinical characterization and longitudinal monitoring of cognition. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 209 Evidence: moderate

Association of plasma biomarkers with longitudinal change in age- and Alzheimer's disease-related brain atrophy patterns

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-17

INTRODUCTIONDetermining whether plasma biomarkers are preferentially associated with Alzheimers disease (AD)-related rather than age-related brain atrophy patterns may clarify their prognostic and diagnostic clinical use. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 818 Evidence: moderate

ObjectiveTo externally replicate and extend prior findings across two structurally independent healthcare data sources, evaluating whether predominant use of antihypertensive medications that stimulate versus inhibit angiotensin II type 2 and type 4 receptor signaling is associated with risk of incident ADRD. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 1,596,034 Evidence: high

Laromestrocel preserves brain volume and cognitive function in Alzheimers disease by inhibiting neuroinflammation

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-17

Neuroinflammation is a principal driver of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease (AD). 2 key findings →

Participants: 49 Evidence: low

One night of closed-loop auditory stimulation during sleep enhances memory consolidation in patients with Alzheimer's Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-17

INTRODUCTIONSleep-dependent memory consolidation is impaired early in Alzheimers disease (AD). 2 key findings →

Participants: 37 Evidence: high

Proteomic markers linking anxiety phenotypes to Alzheimers disease risk: a multi-analyte proteomic analysis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-17

ImportanceAnxiety phenotypes - rumination, global anxiety, and worry (RAW) - are increasingly associated with Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD) risk, yet how anxiety phenotypes relate to coordinated, multi-system biology in the at-risk older adults is unknown. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD)1 and Parkinsons disease and related disorders (PDRD)2 have substantial genetic contributions, yet the role of rare damaging coding variants remains incompletely characterized at population scale3-6. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed