Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Reviewed as evidence on: Clonal hematopoiesis (blood-cancer-linked mutations) and AD risk / microglial inflammation 2 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

BackgroundBone marrow megakaryocytes, the primary source of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the blood, secrete BDNF-packed platelets into the bloodstream. Reduced BDNF serum levels, a proxy for circulating blood-BDNF, have been linked to age-related neurological disorders, including dementia. Whether circulating BDNF levels decline with healthy aging or only in pathological contexts is unclear. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect up to September 2025 for human studies reporting associations between age and serum BDNF in non-clinical populations. Fifteen studies were included. Effect sizes were extracted or converted as Pearsons r and synthesized using a three-level random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses by age, heterogeneity, and quality. FindingsSerum BDNF showed an age-specific decline. Among older adults ([&ge;]60 years), age was negatively associated with serum BDNF (pooled Fishers z=-0.139, 95% CI -0.166 to -0.111; p < 0.0001; I{superscript 2}=0.16%). In younger adults (<60 years), the association was not significant (pooled z=-0.098, 95% CI -0.344 to 0.148; p=0.435; I{superscript 2} = 87.2%). Across all ages, serum BDNF was inversely associated with age (pooled z=-0.127, 95% CI -0.245 to -0.009; p = 0.035), though heterogeneity was substantial (I{superscript 2} = 64.4%; Q (16) = 87.25, p < 0.0001). InterpretationThough not a feature of early or mid-adulthood, declining serum BDNF becomes pronounced in older age. This age-specific trajectory provides a reference point for future studies examining BDNFs relation to cognitive aging and neurodegenerative risk. FundingNo funding was received. RegistrationOpen Science Framework - osf.io/264cp

Key findings

Why it matters

This meta-analysis found that blood levels of BDNF decline with age in people over 60, but not in younger adults. It does not test any treatment, so it cannot show whether changing BDNF levels would prevent or treat dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 35 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 37 of 100. Raw total 37 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 37 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 37 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 35 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 37 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Hayley Dingsdale: h-index 9 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Virginia: institution h-index 1,118 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 35 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 37 out of 100.
Total 37 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Wang, Z. X., Li, X., & Dingsdale, H. (2026). Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Across the Human Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.13.26362873

Vancouver

Wang ZX, Li X, Dingsdale H. Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Across the Human Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.13.26362873.

BibTeX

@article{wang2026-94ee023c,
  author  = {Wang, Z. X. and Li, X. and Dingsdale, H.},
  title   = {{Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Across the Human Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.09.13.26362873},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.13.26362873}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also tagged “clonal-hematopoiesis-and-ad”

2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “clonal-hematopoiesis-and-ad”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →