Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

BackgroundClonal haematopoiesis (CH), the age-related expansion of mutated blood stem cells, is detectable in around 10% of people in their seventies, rises steeply with age, and is associated with several diseases. FindingsLongitudinal trajectories of clonality and grey matter volume were significantly associated over 6 years (Std. est. = -0.176, padj = 0.030), revealing a progressive, left-lateralised cortical atrophy pattern affecting medial temporal and parietal regions. This pattern showed significant spatial correspondence with established AD signatures (r = 0.357, p = 0.003), suggesting that clonality is linked to AD-related patterns of neurodegeneration. Subcortical analyses revealed nominal relative preservation of the caudate and did not detect a statistically significant association with hippocampal volume, suggesting potential divergence from the canonical AD subcortical profile. The CIMS confirmed global atrophy but revealed divergent tissue-type and regional patterns, suggesting the two measures may capture distinct aspects of CH biology. InterpretationTogether, these findings suggest that CH burden may mark biological processes associated with structural brain atrophy in cognitively healthy older adults, with clonality showing a regional pattern that resembles the one reported in AD.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that clonal haematopoiesis was associated with a progressive, left-lateralised cortical atrophy pattern that resembles Alzheimer's disease signatures in cognitively healthy older adults. It suggests clonal haematopoiesis may mark biological processes linked to brain atrophy, but it is not a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 36 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Raw total 38 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 38 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 38 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 36 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,091 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Tamir Chandra: h-index 35 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Mayo Clinic: institution h-index 1,606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 36 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Suwanlikit, Y., Crofts, S. J. C., Moodie, J. E., Marioni, R., Robertson, N. A., Tan, S. H., et al. (2026). Clonal Haematopoiesis Tracks Alzheimer's-like Cortical Atrophy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362681

Vancouver

Suwanlikit Y, Crofts SJC, Moodie JE, Marioni R, Robertson NA, Tan SH, et al. Clonal Haematopoiesis Tracks Alzheimer's-like Cortical Atrophy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.10.26362681.

BibTeX

@article{suwanlikit2026-fc2d0c77,
  author  = {Suwanlikit, Y. and Crofts, S. J. C. and Moodie, J. E. and Marioni, R. and Robertson, N. A. and Tan, S. H. and Vivithanaporn, P. and Bastin and others},
  title   = {{Clonal Haematopoiesis Tracks Alzheimer's-like Cortical Atrophy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.09.10.26362681},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362681}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “amyloid-beta”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-beta”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →