Prion diseases can mimic Alzheimer disease (AD) at presentation. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 345 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
A total of 3363 adults were enrolled in SNAC-K (73.3% participation rate). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,363 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 283,772 participants (mean [SD] age 64.62 [8.96] years; 56.7% women), 60.3% identified as non-Hispanic White and 13.3% as Hispanic/Latino. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 283,772 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep is a fundamental biological process with broad implications for physical and mental health, yet its complex relationship with disease remains poorly understood. 5 key findings →
Participants: 65,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher plasma p-tau levels were associated with worse cognition at baseline and over time, with the strongest effect observed with p-tau217 in cognitively impaired individuals (β = -0.49, p < 0.001). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 has been suggested as a core biomarker for establishing a biological Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 691 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Carriers had lower LAS-FNAME performance (P < 0.001) and higher p-tau217 (P < 0.001), NfL (P = 0.013), and GFAP (P < 0.001) levels than non-carriers. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 463,447 TPMI participants, 4381 PD patients and 43,810 controls were analysed. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
53.0% of the participants were in the group of possible mild cognitive impairment (MCI). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 117 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Donanemab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the insoluble form of β-amyloid found in plaques, significantly slows cognitive and functional decline of AD in participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild AD-related dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The overall PAF for dementia in Denmark was 37·8% (95% CI 35·6-40·0) for the assessed risk factors. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 1,753,515 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study highlights challenges for the reproducibility of α-syn SAA results across different protocols applied by different laboratories. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 30 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Female individuals had higher plaque burden than male individuals (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.67-2.29; P Conclusions and relevance The findings indicate that female sex, APOEε4, and both race and African ancestry were jointly associated with amyloid in this study population. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,268 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 3414 included individuals, the mean (SD) age was 68.8 (6.0) years and 2116 (62%) were female. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,184 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 2,323 MEMENTO participants, 2,136 (92%) were included in this study. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 307 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Biomarkers to determine underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) tau or TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP) pathology during life are needed to advance clinical trials targeting specific FTD pathologies. 3 key findings →
Participants: 513 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Genome-wide significant loci were identified for all biomarkers, including DACT1-DAAM1 (pTau217), KCNJ3 (pTau181), KLHDC4 (NfL), SLC10A7 (GFAP), and PPP4R2 (composite score). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,972 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Multiple proteinopathies commonly coexist in neurodegenerative diseases, making it essential to evaluate plasma biomarker performance in these complex diseases. 2 key findings →
Participants: 253 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
136 adults with T1D (n=90, age 52 years, 58% female, average HbA1c 7.7%) and without T1D (n=46, age 53 years, 57% female, average HbA1c 5.4%) were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 90 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
63/100
In multivariable analyses, none of the plasma biomarkers were significantly associated with cognitive impairment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 403 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) biomarkers offer a minimally invasive alternative for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. 2 key findings →
Participants: 494 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Agreement for the global CDR was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.47-0.59). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,140 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) occurred in 11.2% (10/89) with lecanemab and 13.3% (11/83) with donanemab-less than in pivotal trials. 5 key findings →
Participants: 89 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
62/100
Co-pathology is a common feature of neurodegenerative diseases that complicates diagnosis, treatment and clinical management. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17,187 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
Disturbing dreams were reported by 24.2% overall and all-cause dementia, and AD incidence was 10.8 and 5.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 10,238 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →