27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Artificial intelligence and neuroimaging enable accurate dementia prediction but often involve 'black box' models that can be difficult to trust. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hypertension remains a leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular and renal conditions and dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurological disease and one of the main causes of dementia in around the world. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Perspectivas futuras O mesmo princípio de modulação glial pode ser aplicado em cenários de morte clínica (parada cardiorrespiratória). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This diploma thesis presents the work carried out during 6 months within the Laboratory directed by Professor Millet, written under the supervision and with the support of Dr. Benjamin Tournier and Silvia Braconi Quintaje. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects over 55 million people worldwide and lacks effective disease-modifying therapies targeting neuroinflammation. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Introdução: A Doença de Alzheimer (DA) é uma das principais causas de demência em todo o mundo, prejudicando a vida de milhões de pessoas. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a group of early onset and progressive disorders, characterized by degeneration in the frontal and temporal lobes, and subsequent deterioration in cognition, personality, social behavior, and language, with aggregates of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 being present in ~45% of the cases. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
TDP-43 and FUS are RNA-binding proteins involved in the regulation of diverse RNA-processing events and have been strongly implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Inter-organelle contact sites are key hubs for organelle bidirectional crosstalk. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Control and LOAD hiPSCs exhibited comparable efficiency in forming brain capillary endothelial-like cells (BCECs). 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders in which cerebrovascular pathology contributes to cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The purpose of this narrative review is to examine women's cognitive health and to highlight its association with four major pillars: (1) aging, (2) estrogen decline and loss, (3) diet, and (4) neuroinflammation, and their contribution to cognitive decline, with a focus on this combination to increase awareness and address the progression and potential amelioration of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hippocampal pan-histone H3 crotonylation (H3Kcr) and H3K18cr were significantly upregulated in both 5xFAD and Aβ42-injected mice compared to controls. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Obesity and its associated metabolic disturbances increase the risk of cognitive decline, dementia, and anxiety-related disorders. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Aggregation of the microtubule-binding protein tau is the histopathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases, which are collectively known as tauopathies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The Mediterranean diet, rich in plant-based foods, olive oil, and fish, has been consistently associated with slower cognitive decline and reduced risk of neurodegeneration in observational studies and some clinical trials. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The evidence for cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease is varied, with some studies indicating cognitive benefits but showing limited impact on functional outcomes or disease progression. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive training shows potential in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease, especially as part of multimodal interventions, though current evidence varies in quality and clarity. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive training appears effective in improving cognitive functions and delaying cognitive decline in people at risk of Alzheimer's disease but requires more standardized research for conclusive evidence. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
AWVs were associated with reduced risks for falls (HR: 0.976 for 2 AWVs; 0.936 for ≥3 AWVs) and fractures (HR: 0.978 for 1 AWV; 0.960 for 2 AWVs; 0.927 for ≥3 AWVs), with greater reductions observed with more AVWs. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Misconceptions were common: 38% of participants equated ACP exclusively with decisions to forgo active treatment, and many conflated ACP with current rather than future-oriented care planning. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2,435,099 weighted hospitalizations, palliative care documentation was present in 65,675 (2.70%), increasing from 2.13% in 2016 to 3.43% in 2022. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
ACP is linked to lower EOL spending and a shift from inpatient to outpatient ADRD care; structured ACP delivery should be considered. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Providing end-of-life care for patients with COPD, dementia, and cancer involves a focus on symptom management, integration of palliative care, and respecting patient preferences, while engaging families in the care process. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →