Participants' median age was 70.7 years (Q1-Q3 = 67.8-74.0), with 52.4% being women. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 678 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
In ARIC (n = 1,736, mean age 63, 58.8% female, 48.7% non-Hispanic White individuals, median follow-up 18.6 years), the dementia incidence rate was 10.4 (95% CI, 9.2-11.6) per 1,000 person-years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,736 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CRS is associated with 9% poorer global cognitive function, while CRS treatment is associated with 8-9% improvements in processing speed and working memory. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 107,610 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found that kidney function seems to be associated with AD blood biomarker concentrations. 5 key findings →
Participants: 124 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
ApoE4 levels ascertained by the e4Quant test exhibited clear genotype-dependent stratification. 2 key findings →
Participants: 160 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In CU individuals from the development cohort, the combination of p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC: ALZpath 0.937 vs. 0.905, MSD 0.901 vs. 0.861; p < 0.05, DeLong test; 95% CIs) and model fit (AIC /BIC, p < 0.001) compared to p-tau217 alone. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,545 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Genetic contributions accounted for 42% (males) and 41% (females) of variance in p-tau217. 5 key findings →
Participants: 6,495 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
57/100
Recent studies have demonstrated the high analytical and diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau217 using well-defined cohorts. 2 key findings →
Participants: 276 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 6437 participants screened, with non-Hispanic (NH) White as the reference group, odds ratios of plasma ineligibility were 2.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.96) for Hispanic Black, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.33-1.92) for Hispanic White, 2.10 (95% CI: 1.37-3.38) for NH Asian, and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.27-2.0) for NH Black participants. 3 key findings →
Participants: 6,437 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
57/100
Lactate metabolic clearance rate did not differ between CH and CI subjects (p = 0.988). 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher GAP-43 was cross-sectionally related to all AD biomarkers (p-values < 0.0001) and predicted longitudinal reductions in Aβ42 (p < 0.0001). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher body mass index at baseline was correlated with lower levels of plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217, p-tau217 ratio, neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein, and CLs. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Significant differences in AD biomarkers were observed among different groups. 5 key findings →
Participants: 238 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is widely regarded as a potential preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet its genetic basis remains poorly understood. 5 key findings →
Participants: 9,284 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
From an initial sample (N = 2499), 1064 patients (55,000 notes) were reviewed manually (mean age 76 years; 7.3% women; 9.2% Black; 3.9% Hispanic). 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,499 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
57/100
Green spaces generally showed an inverse association with EOD risk that was almost linear for AD and inverted U-shaped for non-AD. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The clinical heterogeneity of multiple system atrophy (MSA) may, along with the primary aggregation of alpha-synuclein (α-syn), partly be shaped by co-pathologies, such as amyloid-beta (Aβ), phosphorylated (p)-tau, and pTDP-43, though their relevance remains unclear. 3 key findings →
Participants: 70 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this Delphi survey study, international experts reached consensus on a range of criteria for referral to specialist palliative care. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 60 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Accumulating >300 min/week of MVPA, whether concentrated within 1-2 days or distributed evenly across the week, was associated with a decreased risk of dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 91,512 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The analytic sample included 469 participants (mean age 71.2 ± 8.5 years, 53% female). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 469 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Butylphthalide may restore abnormal organization in structural networks of patients with MCI due to AD, and baseline network metrics could be predictive markers for therapeutic efficacy of butylphthalide. 4 key findings →
Participants: 270 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma are composed of exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma p-tau212 might have utility for theragnostics, monitoring therapy efficacy, and as a target engagement biomarker in clinical trials both in sporadic and DSAD. 1 key finding →
Participants: 245 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Totally 7499 participants were included in the analysis, representing 40,728,543 community-living older Americans. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 7,499 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with rapid progression were more likely to have at least one APOE ε4 allele (OR: 2.08 [95% CI: 1.16–3.74], p < 0.01), higher Braak stage (2.19 [1.20–3.98], p < 0.01), higher Thal phase (2.45 [1.24–4.83], p < 0.01), more severe white matter rarefaction (1.68 [1.21–2.35], p < 0.01), and in the final 24 months of life, more frequent untreated/undertreated hyperlipidemia (1.74 [1.35–5.56], p < 0.01) and less frequent untreated/undertreated depression (0.40 [0.17–0.91], p < 0.05). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 75 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →