alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 126–150 of 175 studies with an author at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR) (page 6 of 7) · 28,180 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 175 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

Other institutions

From OpenAlex; 13,658 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Frontal assessment battery and differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Archives of neurology 2004-07-01

The different distribution of pathologic features in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer disease (AD) predicts a predominant dysexecutive syndrome in FTD. 4 key findings →

Participants: 64 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide CN-105 and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. JAMA Network Open 2026-04-03

Among 203 enrolled patients, 186 (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [5.2] years; 119 males [64.0%]) were randomized (137 to the CN-105 group, 49 to the placebo group) and underwent surgery. 5 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: high

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Association Between Decline in Cognitive Processing Speed and CSF Amyloid‐β 42/40 in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults Aged 70, Followed over 5 to 7 Years: Data from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-12-01

Of the 250 participants, 121 (48.4%) were female and the mean age at follow-up was 76.06 (SD 0.48). 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 250 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Clarifying the association of CSF Aβ, tau, BACE1, and neurogranin with AT(N) stages in Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Molecular neurodegeneration 2024-10-08

Current AT(N) stratification for Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for complex combinations of amyloid (A), tau proteinopathy (T) and neurodegeneration (N) signatures. 4 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Biomarker-guided clustering of Alzheimer's disease clinical syndromes

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Neurobiology of Aging 2019-09-10

Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology is extremely heterogeneous, and the evolution from preclinical to mild cognitive impairment until dementia is driven by interacting genetic/biological mechanisms not fully captured by current clinical/research criteria. 2 key findings →

Participants: 20 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Cerebrovascular and amyloid pathology in predementia stages: the relationship with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Alzheimer's research & therapy 2017-12-29

Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and amyloid-β (Aβ) often coexist, but their influence on neurodegeneration and cognition in predementia stages remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Participants: 99 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Memory disorders in probable Alzheimer's disease: the role of hippocampal atrophy as shown with MRI

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 1995-05-01

Magnetic resonance based volumetric measures of hippocampal formation, amygdala (A), caudate nucleus (CN), normalised for total intracranial volume (TIV), were analysed in relation to measures of cognitive deterioration and specific features of memory functions in 18 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →

Participants: 18 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Brain health services for the secondary prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia: Opportunities, challenges, and the business case for existing and future facilities

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-03-17

A European Task Force has recently developed and published the concept and protocols for the setup of the innovative health offer of Brain Health Services for the secondary prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment (dBHS). dBHS are outpatient health care facilities where adult persons can find an assessment of their risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, have their risk level and contributing factors communicated using appropriate language supported by adequate communication tools, can decide to participate to programs for personalized risk reduction if at higher risk, and benefit from cognitive enhancement interventions. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-07-02

NfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including C9orf72 . 3 key findings →

Participants: 474 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Clinical features differentiating patients with postmortem confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Journal of neurology 1999-09-01

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and cortocobasal degeneration (CBD) are often clinically confused with each other because they share a rapid disease progression, parkinsonism that responds poorly or transiently to levodopa therapy, and associated signs (e.g., ocular abnormalities, pyramidal signs and cognitive involvement). 5 key findings →

Participants: 51 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Exploring sex differences in the relationship between depressive symptoms and dementia incidence: prospective results from the PAQUID Study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003-08-01

Ninety-seven men (incidence rate: 14.4/1,000) and 183 women (Incidence rate: 19.0/1,000) developed dementia during 8 years of follow-up. 3 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Locus ceruleus degeneration promotes Alzheimer pathogenesis in amyloid precursor protein 23 transgenic mice

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2006-02-01

Locus ceruleus (LC) degeneration and loss of cortical noradrenergic innervation occur early in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Dynamic 11C-PiB PET Shows Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Alterations in Alzheimer Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019-03-08

ANOVA revealed significant group differences in lateral ventricular SUVR across the Alzheimer, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy control groups ( P = 0.004). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

The French series of autosomal dominant early onset Alzheimer's disease cases: mutation spectrum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 2012-01-01

We describe 56 novel autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease (ADEOAD) families with PSEN1, PSEN2, and AβPP mutations or duplications, raising the total of families with mutations on known genes to 111 (74 PSEN1, 8 PSEN2, 16 AβPP, and 13 AβPP duplications) in the French series. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Prediction of continuous amyloid positron emission tomography with fluid measures of phosphorylated tau and β-amyloid

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. EMBO Molecular Medicine 2025-12-01

CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 contributed most to identify Aβ-positivity, while continuous Aβ-PET load within the positive range was best predicted by plasma P-tau217. 1 key finding →

Participants: 1,053 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

ApoE immunoreactivity and microglial cells in Alzheimer's disease brain

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Neuroscience letters 1995-07-01

The spatial relationship of apolipoprotein E (apoE)-like immunoreactivity (IR) to amyloid beta-peptide (A beta), astrocytes and microglial cells in the brain of Alzheimer's disease was studied by double immunolabelling. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed