27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The 4417 participants in the study included 2618 women (59%) and had a mean (SD) age of 71.3 (4.7) years. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,618 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results support the hypothesis that the appearance of WMH follows age and disease-dependent regional distribution patterns, potentially influenced by differential underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and possibly with a differential link to vascular and neurodegenerative changes. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,836 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Importantly, they suggest that these associations might be explained by a decrease of amyloidosis and tau-pathology. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 512 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The most severe HAND diagnosis (HAD) was rare, but milder forms of impairment remained common, even among those receiving CART who had minimal comorbidities. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 843 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The 3D-CAM operationalizes the CAM algorithm using a 3-minute structured assessment with high sensitivity and specificity relative to a reference standard and could be an important tool for improving recognition of delirium. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 201 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
More-severe diabetes (defined by higher HbA 1c and longer disease duration) but not prediabetes or less-severe diabetes was associated with smaller brain volumes and an increased burden of brain vascular pathology. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,713 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings highlight substantial disparities in the timeliness and comprehensiveness of dementia diagnosis. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 993 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 6451 individuals, the mean (SD) age was 59.4 (6.1) years, and 3841 (59.5%) were women. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,190 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hearing impairment in older adults is independently associated in longitudinal studies with accelerated cognitive decline and incident dementia, and in cross-sectional studies, with reduced volumes in the auditory cortex. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 126 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Increased α-synuclein egress in serum neuronal exosomes precedes the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, persists with disease progression and in combination with clusterin predicts and differentiates Parkinson's disease from atypical parkinsonism. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 314 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The sample consisted of 447 decedents (249 men [56%]; mean [SD] age, 80.3 [9.5] years; median year of death, 2011) spanning 24 years of donation. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of long-term cognitive decline in elderly population. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,539 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The most common place of death in patients with dementia is the retirement or nursing home, followed by hospital and home. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 10,364 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Metabolic dysregulation, especially insulin resistance, was associated with lower brain volumes and executive function in a large, relatively healthy, middle-aged, community-based cohort. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,439 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
It is associated with metabolic syndrome, incident diabetes, carotid atherosclerosis, and endothelial dysfunction, conditions that in turn are strongly linked with brain damage and cognitive impairment. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 766 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
ARIA-E is rare in cognitively unimpaired Aβ+ and Aβ- populations prior to anti-amyloid drug intervention. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,250 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Tau is an axonal microtubule-binding protein. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 133 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
PF and BF were significantly associated with increased likelihoods of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and MCI. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,149 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of 349 participants with available plasma data, 234 met inclusion criteria (31 controls, 141 in the training sample, and 62 in the validation sample). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 46 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma GFAP discriminated AD dementia from normal cognition (adjusted mean difference = 0.90 standard deviation [SD]) and mild cognitive impairment (adjusted mean difference = 0.72 SD), and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to alternative plasma biomarkers. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 567 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Depression, socioeconomic status, hearing handicap, loneliness, education, smoking, tinnitus, little exercise, small social network, stroke, diabetes, and hypertension were all associated with impairments in at least one cognitive measure. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,327 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 has been suggested as a core biomarker for establishing a biological Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 691 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In cross-sectional analyses at baseline, there was no association between DNAm age acceleration and cognitive function scores. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 266 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In total, 6,683 participants were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,683 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Across 3544 participants, ≥65 years of age, with no diagnosed dementia-related disorders, the depression symptom everything was an effort showed high expected influence across all time points. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,544 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →