27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
We tested the CSF of 40 patients with CBS (19 female patients, 65.9 ± 8.6 years) and 28 with PSP (13 female patients, 72.5 ± 8.7 years old), mostly White (n = 50) or Asian (n = 14). αSyn-SAA positivity was observed in 35.9% patients with CBS and 28.6% with PSP. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 50 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our findings suggest that inflammation in the CNS increases in normal aging and is intimately related to markers of neurodegeneration in the preclinical stages of AD and SNAP. sAPPβ and β-secretase activity are not useful diagnostic or staging markers in preclinical AD. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Microbleed presence was associated with lower CSF Aβ42 in AD and vascular dementia (standardized beta = -0.09, P = .003; standardized beta = -0.30, P = .01), and higher CSF tau in controls (standardized beta = 0.10, P = .03). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 914 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD) falls more heavily on women than men. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In a cross-section of older adults, vitamin D deficiency was associated with low mood and with impairment on two of four measures of cognitive performance. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 80 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Systemic inflammation is associated with ischemia and Alzheimer disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease display different spatial distributions of hypoperfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
MRI volumes measured over time are valid biomarkers of pathologic progression of AD across a range of antemortem clinical states. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our data suggest that interactions between biomarkers in AD result in a 2-phase phenomenon of pathological cortical thickening associated with low CSF Aβ, followed by atrophy once CSF p-tau becomes abnormal. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 145 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
PERSI showed superior test-retest reproducibility (1.84%) and group separation ability (cross-sectional Cohen d = 9.45; longitudinal Cohen d = 2.34) compared with other reference regions. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 215 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that patterns of cortical Aβ and tau do not differ in people with PD-CN, people with PD-MCI, and healthy older adults. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dependency upon others to perform ADL was the main factor affecting HRQoL. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 244 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It could be of great improvement for the use of the MMSE in dementia screening in Chinese elderly population. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 9,629 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This analysis combining data from two health systems shows that area deprivation is an independent risk factor for cognitive dysfunction in older adults. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,186 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Attenuation of racial inequalities in older age can be extended to cognitive outcomes, which probably reflects selective survival. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,875 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Using the OSHPE criteria, we found more participants with MCI than with frailty. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,104 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
One of the most devastating nonmotor manifestations of PD is dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Of 115 participants (mean age 40.0 ± 9.2 years; 43.5% female), higher interdaily stability was associated with higher DSMSE scores B = 20.6 (95% CI 5.0-36.2). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 115 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that the initial 1H MRS change in the pathologic progression of AD is an increase in MI/Cr. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The diagnostic guidelines of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have recently been updated to include brain imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, with the aim of increasing the certainty of whether a patient has an ongoing AD neuropathologic process or not. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Age-associated changes in brain imaging and fluid biomarkers are characterized and compared in presenilin 1 (PSEN1)E280A mutation carriers and noncarriers from the world's largest known autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (AD) kindred. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Reliable noninvasive biomarkers are an unmet clinical need for the diagnosis of NASH. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 48 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 413 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma sphingolipids have been shown to predict cognitive impairment and hippocampal volume loss, but there is little research in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 120 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used instrument for the screening of cognitive impairment worldwide, but its ability to produce valid estimates of dementia in populations of low socioeconomic status and minimal literacy skills has not been adequately established. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,933 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →