29,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This study suggests that plasma GFAP is a sensitive biomarker for detecting and tracking reactive astrogliosis and Aβ pathology even among individuals in the early stages of AD. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 300 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 157 participants initially assessed, 137 were enrolled in the Age-Well clinical trial, and 127 were analyzed in this study. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 157 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study found that CSF-based estimates using adjusted data-driven cutoffs were up to 10% higher than PET-based estimates in people without dementia, whereas the results were similar among people with dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 97 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 52 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
All synaptic biomarkers tested had a good discriminatory power to distinguish patients with AD abnormal CSF from those with non-AD disorders. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 81 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers was poor (area under the curve [AUC] between 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·62] and 0·74 [0·66-0·82]) except for plasma NfL concentrations, which had an AUC of 0·88 (0·82-0·93) for the differentiation of the asymptomatic group versus the prodromal Alzheimer's disease group and 0·95 (0·92-0·98) for the asymptomatic group versus the Alzheimer's disease dementia group. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 282 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study highlights challenges for the reproducibility of α-syn SAA results across different protocols applied by different laboratories. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 30 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
More research is needed to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying these regional associations, which may involve motor and sensorimotor circuits hitherto largely neglected in the pathophysiology of AD. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This is the first study to show that WM integrity is associated with frailty in older adults. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 227 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A fully automated computational approach included classical statistical methods, support vector machine procedures, and machine learning techniques (random forest and sequential feature selection procedures). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,794 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Inclusion of instrumental activities of daily living restriction in the criteria of mild cognitive impairment improves the prediction of dementia and the stability of this status over time. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,517 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early event in Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,908 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older Medicare beneficiaries in California with DS, especially those with dementia, have a high level of multimorbidity including several treatable conditions. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 100 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Contrary to previous reports, head trauma was not a risk factor for AD, and smoking did not protect against AD. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The relative performance of semi-quantitative amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and predicting the cognitive evolution of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is still debated. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 677 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia diagnosis increasingly relies on blood-based biomarkers, yet their performance in diverse populations remains insufficiently characterized. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 605 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that the informant report is particularly relevant in patients with MCI where it strongly relates to higher amyloid-PET, indicative of impairment due to AD. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 25 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
). Moreover, 12 proteins related to endothelial function and inflammation were associated with neuroimaging features of SVD. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 35 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Participants' median age was 70.7 years (Q1-Q3 = 67.8-74.0), with 52.4% being women. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 678 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 4080 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 66.5 (8.9) years, and 2241 (54.9%) were female. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,080 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Age-related frailty and disease-related frailty may represent different degrees of frailty severity on a biological level. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,199 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Based on data from their first NACC visit with AD, there was considerable heterogeneity in language performance across people with EOAD and LOAD. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,189 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 798 patients (154 with probable DLB and 644 with AD) were included, and the mean age was 81.4 years (SD 6.33). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 798 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) feature neurobiological Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in 50% to 70% of the cases and develop dementia within the next 5 to 7 years. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study included 3540 participants with RVC data and 489 with WMH data (median [IQR] age: 73.2 [71.4-76.3] and 72.5 [71.2-75.4] years; female: 52.9% and 47.6%) over a median follow-up of 7.4 [IQR 5.5-8.5] and 3.8 [IQR 2.9-5.3] years, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,540 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 29,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 29,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (63.3% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.5% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →