28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Recent studies suggested that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was related to a higher risk of dementia incidence or hospitalizations in western populations, but the evidence is limited in Asian cities. 3 key findings →
Participants: 66,820 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The findings may help clinicians identify athletes who are at risk for worse impairments after a concussion due to preinjury sleep difficulties. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 348 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Dementia and subtypes Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia may be related to atrial fibrillation even if no clinical stokes have occurred. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,584 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Survival analyses indicated that subjects with the lowest EF scores were more likely to fall sooner and more likely to experience multiple falls during the 66 months of follow-up (p Conclusions/significance These findings demonstrate that among community-living older adults, the risk of future falls was predicted by performance on EF and attention tests conducted 5 years earlier. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the last decade, the association between diet and cognitive function or dementia has been largely investigated. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Routine screening of cognition in older subjects with diabetes is recommended. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 396 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The mean age of participants was 77.1 years (SD = 7.6), and 2779 were women (weighted % = 56.7). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,238 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The weighted prevalence of dementia at provincial level in China in 2018 ranged from 2.62% (95%BCI: 1.70%, 3.91%) to 13.53% (95%BCI: 8.82%, 20.93%). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 17,176 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 844 eligible individuals were consecutively approached, 294 consented to participate, and 204 completed the study (mean [SD] age, 70.0 [5.1] years; 127 women [62.3%]). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 127 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
4,824 patients seen at the memory clinic between 2008-2018 were included in this study (mean age 72.7 [standard deviation 11.0] years, 2,712 [56%] female, 543 [11%] Black). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,824 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The sample included 740 donors (417 female [56.4%]; mean [SD] age at death, 81.5 [10.3] years; mean [SD] VBI score, 0.7 [1.0]; and median life course ADI, 7.08 [IQR, 4.33-9.83]), with residential years spanning 1905 to 2018. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 740 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 1614 older adults (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [8.7] years; 980 women [60.7%]), 853 were Mexican American (mean [SD] age, 63.9 [7.9] years; 566 women [66.4%]), and 761 were non-Hispanic White (mean [SD] age, 69.1 [8.7] years; 414 women [54.4%]). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 280 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sensory impairments are associated with greater risk of dementia in Chinese older adults. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 250,752 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Depression symptoms before the onset of AD are associated with the development of AD, even in families where first depression symptoms occurred more than 25 years before the onset of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 1,953 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Long-term exposure to the highest tertile of PM10 or ozone was significantly associated with an increased risk of AD and VaD. 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The type, frequency, and extent of MR signal abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease and normal aging are a subject of controversy. 1 key finding →
Participants: 12 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although levodopa is the most effective medication available for treating the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease, in certain instances (eg, mild symptoms, tremor as the only or most prominent symptom, aged Conclusions and relevance Strong evidence supports using levodopa and dopamine agonists for motor symptoms at all stages of Parkinson disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Sleep is evolutionarily conserved across all species, and impaired sleep is a common trait of the diseased brain. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this large cohort study of elderly subjects, the degree of dVRS appears independently associated with age, hypertension, volume of white matter hyperintensities, and lacunar infarctions. dVRS should be considered as another MRI marker of cerebral small vessel disease in the elderly with regional variations in their severity. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We conducted a case-control study of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) on 170 cases aged 52 to 96 years, and 170 controls matched for age, sex and, where possible, the general practice of origin. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of dementia, and VaD in particular, in very old people. 4 key findings →
Participants: 350 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Participants with the fewest teeth had the highest risk of prevalence and incidence of dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 118 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebral white matter lesions are frequently observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in elderly people and are associated with stroke and dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,625 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Stroke is associated with AD among elderly individuals. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sidewalks are indispensable environmental resources for daily life in that they encourage physical activity. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 76,053 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →