alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 1–25 of 25 studies in Risk factors in medRxiv · 30,580 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 25 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Other subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

What “Risk factors” covers

Risk factors — Conditions, exposures and habits linked to a higher or lower chance of dementia, and how strong each link is.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Age-dependent associations of sleep duration and insomnia symptoms with cognitive decline across five decades of adult life: a multi-cohort longitudinal study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-09-28

In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA: n=9,473, median age 64, range 50 to ≥90), linear mixed-effects models examined age-specific differences in cognitive change (recall and fluency) associated with sleep duration, difficulty falling asleep, nocturnal awakenings, incorporating sleep-by-age-by-time interactions, with initial adjustment for sociodemographic factors and further adjustment for health and lifestyle factors. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 9,473 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Sleep duration and mental well-being are associated with delayed memory in a 12-week digital and remote community-sample study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-08-02

Sleeping more than one’s usual average the night before testing was associated with better delayed memory ( β = 0.03, p = 0.02), while no between-person sleep effects emerged. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 329 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Age-Related Speech-in-Noise Hearing Loss in Parkinson’s Disease and APOE E4 Carriers

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-06-09

Age-related hearing loss is a leading modifiable risk factor for dementia and is increasingly recognized as a non-motor feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD). 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Sequence-based variant-effect predictions reveal trait-specific regulatory-layer profiles of complex-trait heritability

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-19

Partitioned-heritability studies have shown which tissues carry the heritability of complex traits, but whether the regulatory layer whose annotations are most informative for heritability within a tissue differs between traits has not been tested, because measured annotations for different layers come from different sets of biosamples. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Comorbidities of dementia in electronic health records: validation of a natural language processing app and comparison with data linkage

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-19

MedCAT Comorbidity demonstrated predictive ability for mortality (HR 1.11 per condition), although the model fit was better using comorbidity from hospital admission data. 4 key findings →

Participants: 3,543 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability, Glycemic Status and the Risk of Dementia, Stroke, and All-Cause Mortality: A UK Biobank Cohort Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-13

Absolute BPV was associated with mortality, and DBP and MAP variability with overall stroke, after accounting for glycemic status and mean blood pressure. 5 key findings →

Design: prospective cohort Participants: 57,611 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Seasonally Normalized Vitamin D Status and Long-Term Mortality and Multisystem Disease Risk in the UK Biobank

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-09

Seasonally normalized 25(OH)D identifies a reproducible state of systemic vulnerability while reducing exposure misclassification caused by calendar timing of measurement. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 412,020 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

A Multiethnic Analysis of DNA Methylation Reveals Links Between Alzheimer’s Disease and Metabolic Comorbidities

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-07

The two sites associated with interactions between AD and a metabolic condition could explain the influence that those conditions have on the risk for AD and are prime candidates for future study. 3 key findings →

Participants: 551 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Geographic Heterogeneity in the Association Between Schooling and Cognitive Change Among Older Adults in India

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-28

Higher educational attainment is associated with steeper measured cognitive decline among older adults in India, but whether this association is uniform across the country is unknown. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,510 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Volumetric Integrity of Frontotemporal and Perisylvian Regions for Predicting Behavioral and Language Impairment in Behavioral FTD: A Structural MRI Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-05

In this bvFTD cohort, structural volumes of key frontotemporal and perisylvian regions did not predict behavioral or language impairments after correction for multiple comparisons. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 87 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Beyond Usual Pace: Quick Walking Speed and Brain Health Outcomes in the Framingham Heart Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-15

We estimated associations per SD slower walking or smaller adaptability using linear, logistic, and Cox regression (10-year follow-up), overall and in women and men. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,308 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

An explainable multimodal framework for exploring depression-associated speech representations in Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-01

By comparing these unsupervised representations to a depression-labelled source corpus, one cluster demonstrated mathematical proximity (measured via cosine similarity in a shared latent space) to the source depression centroid. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Carbonaceous Components Underlying Wildfire Smoke PM 2.5 -Associated Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias in Older US Adults

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-11

Wildfire smoke exposure is increasing across the U.S., but the long-term neurological effects of smoke-specific fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and its carbonaceous components remain uncertain. 4 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Association of Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure with Dementia-Related Neuropathologies at Autopsy in a Community-Based Cohort

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-02-05

Higher exposure to PM 2.5 was associated with cerebral arteriolosclerosis and atherosclerosis at death, consistent with the known vascular toxicity of this pollutant. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 909 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Mediation of the relationship between air pollution and dementia: A UK Biobank study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-02-22

Exposure to the highest quintile of PM 2·5 (Rte:1·14, 95% CI:1·06-1·23), NO x (Rte:1·11, 95% CI:1·03-1·20) or NO 2 (Rte:1·08, 95% CI:0·99-1·16), compared to the lowest quintile, was associated with higher dementia risk. 2 key findings →

Evidence: high

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Air Pollution, Health, and Economics: Evaluating the Impact of WHO targets and Guideline Values on Mortality and Morbidity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-03-30

Direct medical and productivity-related costs associated with incident cases were estimated using a cost-of-illness (COI) framework. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Biopsychosocial risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias in UK immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-05-13

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region represents the area of greatest projected growth in instances of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRDs) globally, yet, it remains virtually uncharacterized in health studies of aging and ADRDs. 4 key findings →

Participants: 3,552 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Prenatal Pesticide Exposure and Early Alzheimer Disease-Related Biomarker and Cognitive Changes in Midlife

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-05-17

In this prospective birth cohort study, prenatal exposure to a persistent environmental toxicant was associated with lower plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and worse cognitive performance in midlife, consistent with DDE accelerating the preclinical trajectory of AD-related biological changes decades before symptom onset. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 179 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed    Where this research is being discussed: events