27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Baseline DBP and longitudinal increases in DBP were independently associated with a greater WMHV, and the association between DBP and WMHV was greatest among blacks. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,281 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Limited evidence suggests that the APOEε4 allele may confer risk for CTE, but previous studies were small with limited scope. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 294 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This cohort study using pooled data from 6 cohort studies found that incident MI was not associated with a decrease in global cognition, memory, or executive function at the time of the event compared with no MI but was associated with faster declines in global cognition, memory, and executive function over time. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 30 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
NPS were present in 95% in at least one time point. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The analytical sample size of the study was 2,068,937, including 9.9% Black, 82.7% White, and 7.4% Hispanic individuals. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The neuropsychologic test battery from the Uniform Data Set (UDS) of the Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADC) program of the National Institute on Aging consists of brief measures of attention, processing speed, executive function, episodic memory, and language. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia rates varied over 60% between groups, providing a comprehensive benchmark for the NAPA goal of reducing disparities. 2 key findings →
Participants: 18,778 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At the beginning of June 2020, there were nearly 7 million reported cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide and over 400,000 deaths in people with COVID-19. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia emerged as the most potent risk factor for institutionalization in this 12-year community-based epidemiological study. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,147 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Future well-designed longitudinal researches examining the direct and indirect relationship between tooth loss and dementia risk are encouraged. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings on participants who are at high risk of dropout may be useful in the planning phase of future prospective studies. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 5,278 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Although the association between high blood pressure (BP), particularly in midlife, and late-life dementia is known, less is known about variations by race and sex. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,003 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ObjectivesIdentifying modifiable factors that shape cognitive aging trajectories is a central goal in aging research. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,140 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The prevalence of dementia, AD, and VaD among individuals aged 65 years and older were 5.14% (95% CI, 4.71-5.57), 3.21% (95% CI, 2.87-3.55), and 1.50% (95% CI, 1.26-1.74), respectively. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,096 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Among older adults, anemia is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,552 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At cohort entry, the mean age was 54.8 years (SD 13.3), 56.5% were men, and 72.8% were black. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 324 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The number of studies examining ECHO and ECHO-like models of medical tele-education has been modest compared with the scope and scale of implementation throughout the USA and internationally. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The TICS has high diagnostic validity for identification of dementia among ethnically diverse older adults, especially when supported by the DQ and prior visit data. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 256 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this large multicentre and long-term population-based study, some well-known risk factors for dementia, of vascular and Alzheimer's type, are confirmed but not others. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 4,075 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Twelve studies were identified. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Age, sex, functional limitation, and malnutrition seem to be the strongest predictors of death for patients with Alzheimer's disease in nursing homes. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 9,264 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
MCI was prevalent in 24.7% of participants at baseline. 2 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 3,673 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This systematic review commissioned by the UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), considers how the evidence base for noise effects on health has changed following the recent reviews undertaken for the WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although APOE ε4 carriers are at high risk for cognitive decline, our findings suggest possible intervention targets, including the enhancement of cognitive reserve and improvement of other psychosocial and health factors, to promote cognitive resilience among black and white APOE ε4 carriers. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 2,487 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The intervention provided that most scarce of caregiver commodities--time. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →