28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I2 = 95%). 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 49,227 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the UGOT cohort, the optimal cutoff improved diagnostic accuracy compared with the standard single cutoff, particularly in CKD and anemia (CKD: from 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72; to 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; anemia: from 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84; to 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90), with consistent findings in the Roche cohort. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,571 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 283,772 participants (mean [SD] age 64.62 [8.96] years; 56.7% women), 60.3% identified as non-Hispanic White and 13.3% as Hispanic/Latino. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 283,772 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study highlights challenges for the reproducibility of α-syn SAA results across different protocols applied by different laboratories. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 30 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Co-pathology is a common feature of neurodegenerative diseases that complicates diagnosis, treatment and clinical management. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17,187 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This randomized clinical trial found that ADRD screening in PC was not associated with improvement in family member health-related quality of life, caregiver preparedness, or caregiving self-efficacy. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 1,808 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this study's cohort of 155 individuals with SETRS (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [10.3] years; 56 female participants [36.1%]), 153 of 155 (98.7%) scored below the cutoff of 26 for mild cognitive impairment, and 73 of 155 (47.1%) scored below the cutoff of 10 for severe dementia (mean [SD] MoCA score, 9.8 [6.4]). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 155 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Self- and informant-reported ADL and IADL impairments were examined at overall and item levels. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,050 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Approximately half (54.5%, 35/55) of participants showed a decline in RBMT scores during the 2-year follow-up and were defined as the memory decline group. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 55 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
SB-C significantly differentiated cognitively unimpaired and impaired groups (P < 0.001), correlated with standard cognitive measures, and showed moderate-to-high area under the curve (0.56-0.82) for classifying biomarker positivity, with strongest results in BioFINDER-Primary Care. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 736 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global rise in dementia necessitates scalable cognitive assessments that can evolve to serve both clinical and research applications. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,664 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Undiagnosed dementia is common and associated with increased mortality, identifying a vulnerable population missed by current diagnostic pathways. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 13,142 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Due to rapid population aging, the number of Chileans with dementia is estimated to triple by 2050. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,778 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This longitudinal evidence supports a link between the ALPS-I and cognitive degeneration. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is marked by progressive cognitive decline, highlighting the importance of cognitive assessment in both clinical practice and research. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,447 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Eighty patients were included (mean age: 81 years, interquartile range 74-86 years; 36.2% female, ∼80% with dementia and Alzheimer disease). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Magnetic resonance imaging based dementia severity assessment facilitates timely diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Internal consistency of the ACE-III was strong (McDonald's ω = 0.889). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,265 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We developed a serum Raman spectroscopy-based ensemble learning approach for graded cognitive screening. 5 key findings →
Participants: 220 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We observed measurement differences in the HCAP across H/L and NHW older adults for the memory, language, executive functioning, and orientation, but not visuospatial, domains. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Patients with PDD showed a more severe phenotype than those with DLB, with higher scores in motor severity, hallucinations, delusions, somnolence, and urinary dysfunction (all p≤0.01). 5 key findings →
Participants: 31 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Four themes described current primary care practitioner practices in dementia diagnosis and management (1) Family concern triggers dementia investigation (2) GPs delay conversations about dementia (3) Completing routine cognitive assessments in the 75+ health assessment, and (4) Variability in post-diagnostic care. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria, covering populations from healthy controls to individuals with subjective cognitive decline, MCI, AD, and other dementias. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study provides validated conversion tables between the Q mci screen and two widely-used cognitive instruments, to support the use of the Q mci screen in research (facilitating cross-instrument comparability and harmonization across studies), and clinical settings (determining eligibility for disease-modifying therapies). 2 key findings →
Participants: 101 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a stage between normal cognition and dementia, and timely diagnosis of this condition offers the opportunity for effective interventions to slow down the progression to dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →