The plasma level of sAPPβ was significantly increased in AD patients than in cognitively healthy controls. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The plasma level of sAPPβ was significantly increased in AD patients than in cognitively healthy controls. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease without a cure. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The expression of microRNA (miRNA) is influenced by ongoing biological processes, including aging, and has begun to play a role in the measurement of neurodegenerative processes in central nervous system. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) is a term used to describe a variety of neurological impairments observed in HIV-infected individuals. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is considered to be mainly driven by two major hallmarks (tau and amyloid beta). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The uptake of 18 F‐PI‐2620 was distinctly increased in the AD group across all the ROIs. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood phospho-tau181 may offer a useful biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) negatively regulates intracellular levels of PIP3 and antagonizes the PI3K signaling pathway important for cell survival. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previous studies of human hepatic encephalopathy (HE) have shown decreased levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in Alzheimer type II astrocytes. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a serious neuropsychiatric complication of liver failure, characterized neuropathologically by astrocyte swelling, microglial activation and Alzheimer Type II astrocytosis. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Basal ganglia, cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter were studied for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in four cases of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) with Alzheimer II gliosis and five age-matched controls. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Previous studies have described altered expression of metallothioneins (MTs) in neurodegenerative diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS), Down syndrome, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Both (18)F-FDG and (11)C-PiB imaging appear to be of limited use for predicting the progression from MCI to dementia due to AD in short-term follow-up, irrespective of the strategy of analysis. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Inexpensive, non-invasive tools for assessing Alzheimer-type pathophysiologies are needed. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The aim of this study was to compare brain glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels to the modifications of cognitive functions (Blessed test score [BTS]), the density of the main neuropathological lesions (senile plaques [SP] and neurofibrillary tangles [NFT]), and the density of the two main subtypes of beta A4 deposits (classic plaques and diffuse deposits) in a series of patients with normal aging and senile dementia of the Alzheimer type of various degrees of severity. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The GFAP mRNA levels were compared to the density of the senile plaques (SP) in postmortem brain samples of 8 cases, either non-demented or affected by senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study provides new insights into the regional binding distribution of a first-generation and a second-generation Tau tracer in limbic and neocortical regions in adults with DS, as well as regional differences in Tau binding in adult with DS vs. those with AD. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The search for new therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major goal in medicine and society, also due to the impressive economic and social costs of this disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Biomarkers of the molecular pathology underpinning dementia syndromes are increasingly recognized as crucial for diagnosis and development of disease-modifying treatments. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a rate-limiting step in catecholamine synthesis in which its activity influences Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and IQ of schizophrenia patients, has been studied for a long time. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Investigating new drugs or formulations that target Alzheimer disease (AD) is critical for advancing therapeutic interventions. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Expression of LRP1 by neurons in proximity to senile amyloid plaques does not appear to play a major role in modulating the formation of these proximal deposits or in the appearance of the associated neuritic pathology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Clinical studies have shown that epileptic seizures worsen Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and related cognitive deficits; however, the underlying mechanism is unclear. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In 4 of 5 patients treated with lecanemab or donanemab and who had moderate or severe ARIA-E, Aβ PET signal decreased significantly more in regions that had been involved with ARIA-E. Greater regional Aβ PET signal reduction in areas involved by ARIA-E may reflect enhanced local Aβ clearance, reduced tracer binding site availability, impaired glymphatic flow from immune complex deposition, or other mechanisms. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Biomarkers serve as a quantitative measure of brain injury and may predict cognitive outcome after cardiac arrest. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →