28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
A lack of convenient and reliable biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis is a common challenge for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The A+P+T- group showed a slower rate of increase in tau-PET compared to the A+P+T+ group, primarily in neocortical regions. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 231 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This paper highlights the growing evidence that blood-based tau biomarkers have early diagnostic utility for Alzheimer's disease. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our findings demonstrate that spindle and SO activity during sleep constitute predictive and non-invasive biomarkers of neurodegeneration and cognition in AD patients. 2 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
MMP-9 may have more detrimental effects on AD-related pathological and cognitive changes in women. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 238 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Despite assumptions that cognitive changes invariably follow biomarker changes, early neuropsychological difficulties may emerge before/concurrently with plasma p-tau181 changes. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 402 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our findings suggest that plasma, CSF, and neuroimaging biomarkers differ considerably within the ATN framework; the most accurate target biomarkers for diagnosing AD were the CSF-A, neuroimaging-T, and neuroimaging-N within each ATN modality. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,340 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Physical activity is a promising preventative strategy for Alzheimer's disease: it is associated with lower dementia risk, better cognition, greater brain volume and lower brain beta-amyloid. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings indicate that plasma pTau181, plasma pTau217 and amyloid-β PET convey overlapping information and therefore predict the dynamic phase of asymptomatic amyloid-β accumulation with comparable performances. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 75 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In adjusted models, higher concentrations of p-tau181 (β per year 0·93 [95% CI 0·71 to 1·16]; p<0·0001), p-tau217 (β per year 1·31 [1·03 to 1·58]; p<0·0001), neurofilament light chain (β per year 0·76 [0·56 to 0·96]; p<0·0001), and GFAP (β per year 0·37 [0·21 to 0·53]; p<0·0001) were associated with an accelerated decline of chair-stand performance over time. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,363 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Phosphorylated Tau181 (pTau181) in CSF and recently in plasma has been associated with Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 154 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Sleep is a potential early, modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Predicting not just if, but also when, cognitively unimpaired individuals are likely to develop onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptoms would be useful to clinical trials and, eventually, clinical practice. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 603 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma p-tau217 is a prognostic marker for identifying individuals who will develop cognitive impairment within ten years. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 215 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Analyses measured the associations between predictor variables and the memory score, and whether AT(N) biomarker profiles significantly improved prediction of memory z score rates of change beyond a model with clinical and genetic variables only. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 480 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study found that CSF-based estimates using adjusted data-driven cutoffs were up to 10% higher than PET-based estimates in people without dementia, whereas the results were similar among people with dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 97 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These were compared with the prevalence of 3 clinically defined diagnostic groups (mild cognitive impairment or dementia, dementia, and clinically defined probable Alzheimer disease). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 4,660 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that this blood biomarker test could allow for distinguishing individuals with brain amyloid-positive PET findings from individuals with amyloid-negative PET findings and serve as an aid for Alzheimer disease diagnosis. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 249 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 6256 participants (3402 women [54.4%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 61.7 [6.6] years), 510 received an all-cause dementia diagnosis within 17 years of baseline. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 766 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall, 2,277 individuals had at least 1 baseline blood biomarker available (n = 357 for CSF subsample, n = 649 for PET subsample), among whom 257 were diagnosed with clinical AD/mixed dementia during follow-up. 2 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 357 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
However, the importance of detailed cognitive phenotyping in patients without dementia when interpreting p-tau217 results remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,323 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We analyzed 1,240 MRIs from 473 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.4 [range: 49-87]; 32.8% women). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,240 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In DDI (n = 431), participants were classified as CN A-/T- (n = 169), A+/T- (CN = 26, MCI = 24), A+/T+ (CN = 40, MCI = 105), and A-/T+ (CN = 34, MCI = 33), with a mean age of 64.1 years and 55.9% female. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 431 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sixty consecutive patients with prodromal or mild AD were screened; 50 were randomized to gamma or sham tACS (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [7.8] years; 25 [50.0%] female and 25 [50.0%] male). 5 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ROC curves of the five best two-, three-, and four-parameter combinations were analyzed for significant superiority by a bootstrapping wrapper around a support vector machine with linear kernel. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 115 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →