Among cognitively unimpaired participants with a family history of dementia, changes in cognition and brain MRI outcomes from baseline to year 3 did not differ significantly between those who followed the MIND diet and those who followed the control diet with mild caloric restriction. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT
Participants: 604
Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
72/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 72 out of 100.
·
JAMA neurology
·
2024-03-01
Of 586 included decedents, 415 (70.8%) were female, 171 (29.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age at death was 90.9 (6.0) years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 754
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
71/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 71 out of 100.
·
JAMA neurology
·
2018-08-01
After correcting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni procedure, we observed a statistically significant interaction between APOE-ε4 and sex on CSF total tau (β = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.55; P Conclusions and relevance We provide robust evidence of a stronger association between APOE-ε4 and CSF tau levels among women compared with men across multiple independent data sets. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 1,798
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
70/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 70 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2002-02-01
These results suggest that frequent participation in cognitively stimulating activities is associated with reduced risk of AD. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 111
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Loneliness is associated with an increased risk of late-life dementia but not with its leading causes. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 76
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
66/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2025-10-28
Biomarkers were measured in 431 Black and 583 White participants (mean age of 77 and 80 years and 17% and 21% of men, respectively), generating a balanced sample of 366:366. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort
Participants: 1,014
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Higher concentrations of serum biomarkers were associated with the development of clinical AD; especially, the time-specific associations were notable: t-tau 8 to 16 years, and Nf-L and GFAP 4 to 8 years prior to clinical AD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,327
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
66/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2022-11-29
Blood biomarkers showed significant longitudinal changes corresponding to cognitive decline, clinical AD, and structural MRI characteristics. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,327
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Greater purpose in life is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older persons. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 1,238
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
66/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2013-12-11
Early age at surgical menopause was associated with cognitive decline and AD neuropathology. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,884
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
65/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2015-07-15
Black decedents with AD dementia are more likely to have mixed brain pathologies compared with age-, sex-, education-, and cognition-matched white decedents with AD dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 122
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The higher risk of AD among blacks may stem from lower level of cognitive test performance persisting throughout the observation period rather than faster rate of late-life cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 7,735
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
MIND diet is associated with better cognitive functioning independently of common brain pathology, suggesting that the MIND diet may contribute to cognitive resilience in the elderly. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 569
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The combinations of pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias associated with cognitive and motor decline and their onsets of associations varied; only tau tangles, Parkinson's disease pathology, and macroinfarcts were associated with decline of all three phenotypes. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Greater purpose in life is associated with a reduced risk of AD and MCI in community-dwelling older persons. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 951
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Complexity at multiple levels needs to be understood and overcome to develop effective treatments and preventions for cognitive decline and AD dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
These data suggest that AD pathology is more likely to be clinically expressed as dementia in women than in men. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 57
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Replication of these findings in a dietary intervention trial would be required to verify its relevance to brain health. 2 key findings →
Participants: 960
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The presence of epsilon 4 was associated with risk of developing AD on follow-up (relative risk, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.89). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 624
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Late-life lower BMI relates to faster rates of decline in cognition, specifically semantic memory and episodic memory, in both blacks and whites. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 2,134
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Research on racial differences in Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia has increased in recent years. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
We examined the association of type 2 diabetes mellitus to function in different cognitive systems in older black and white persons. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 1,437
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
We examined the association of social activity with cognitive decline in 1138 persons without dementia at baseline with a mean age of 79.6 (SD = 7.5) who were followed for up to 12 years (mean = 5.2; SD = 2.8). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,138
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The Minority Aging Research Study (MARS) is a longitudinal, epidemiologic cohort study of decline in cognitive function and risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older African Americans, with brain donation after death added as an optional component for those willing to consider organ donation. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Baseline cognition was poorer in individuals born and residing in the South, particularly those attending desegregated schools at age 12. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.