Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 251–275 of 275 studies (page 11 of 11) · 27,780 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 275 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Showing 275 studies tagged mitochondrial — clear

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

The DSCR1 (Adapt78) gene was independently discovered as a resident of the "Down syndrome candidate region"and as an "adaptive response"shock or stress gene that is transiently induced during oxidative stress. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I), one of the most complicated multi-protein enzyme complexes, is important for energy metabolism because it is the initial enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

High-throughput profiling of the mitochondrial proteome using affinity fractionation and automation

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Electrophoresis 2000-10-01

Recent studies have demonstrated the need for complementing cellular genomic information with specific information on expressed proteins, or proteomics, since the correlation between the two is poor. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Deposits of amyloid beta-peptide (A beta), reduced glucose uptake into brain cells, oxidative damage to cellular proteins and lipids, and excitotoxic mechanisms have all been suggested to play roles in the neurodegenerative process in Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

The transcription factor NF-kappaB is expressed in neurons wherein it is activated in response to a variety of stress- and injury-related stimuli including exposure to cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha), and excitotoxic and oxidative insults. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

The evidence is compelling that free radicals, plus increases in free cytosolic Ca2+ and Na+, figure prominently in neuronal death after exposure to glutamate and dicarboxylic excitotoxins such as NMDA and kainate. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

The Silent Saboteur: How Mitochondria Shape the Long-Term Fate of the Injured Brain

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025-03-27

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet the mechanistic link remains unclear. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Although endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and maladaptive unfolded protein response (UPR) are increasingly implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the influence of vitamin D (VitD) on these mechanisms remains unclear. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

MTHFR*677C>T produces distinct prodromal disease signatures in a mouse model of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-09

These data further support the use of the LOAD2.Mthfr 677C>T mouse model to study aspects of ADRD such as cerebrovascular compromise. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Closed-head injury produces a delayed, region-specific defect in glucose-carbon routing at the pyruvate branchpoint in APP/PS1 KI mice

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-06

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and both conditions are associated with impaired glucose metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

These findings identify an age-dependent breakdown of the metabolic resilience network formed by NAMPT, NAD⁺, SIRT1, and AMPK as a key mechanistic driver of metabolic stress-induced early AD-like pathology. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Autophagy Stimulation by Intermittent Fasting and Its Potential Neuroprotective Role in Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-08-24

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterised by progressive accumulation of misfolded proteins and failure of cellular clearance pathways, particularly the autophagy–lysosomal system. 2 key findings →

Evidence: high

High-Content Screening Identifies Dithiocarbamates As A Class Of Chemicals That Disrupts TDP-43 Proteostasis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-19

Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) aggregation and loss of function are hallmark features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) among other neurodegenerative diseases. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Pantethine and Neurodegeneration: A Coenzyme A-Centered Framework Linking Metabolism, Neuroinflammation, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-10-23

Neurodegenerative diseases are a growing global health burden associated with aging and characterized by progressive neuronal dysfunction, metabolic failure, mitochondrial impairment, oxidative stress, and chronic neuroinflammation. 1 key finding →

Design: narrative review Evidence: low

Spermine inhibits ferroptosis in vascular dementia rats by intervening Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 expression in chondriosome

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-09

Spermine exerts neuroprotective effects in VaD by inhibiting TRPM2-mediated oxidative stress and activating the Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 pathway, thereby suppressing ferroptosis. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

BNIP3L/NIX-mediated mitophagy limits Alzheimer’s disease pathology and preserves neuronal function

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-20

Defective mitophagy is emerging as a key contributor to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the neuronal pathways governing mitochondrial clearance and their contribution to disease progression remain poorly understood. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a shared biological thread between terrestrial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in the unique stress environment of spaceflight, making mitochondrial pathophysiology a compelling target for comparative investigation. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer’s disease involves progressive necroptosis of neurons, and the associated cognitive deficits can be mitigated by inhibiting cAMP-degrading phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D). 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Mitochondrial DNA copy number in neurodegenerative diseases: a global meta-analysis of 156 comparisons across 76 studies

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-29

Consequently, changes in mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN), the number of mtDNA genomes per cell or tissue sample, are associated with diseases ranging from cancer and obesity to psoriasis and all-cause mortality. 5 key findings →

Design: systematic review Evidence: high

From across this tag

8 of the 275 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 8. The same 8 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed