Home › Research › End-of-life care
MAPKs: new targets for neurodegeneration
Harper SJ, Wilkie N.. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2003-04-01
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Neurodegenerative diseases remain a huge unmet pharmaceutical need. For some diseases such as Parkinson's disease, there are currently only palliative therapies, and for others such as Alzheimer's disease there are no proven therapies on the market that have any significant impact on disease progression. Recent work has suggested that cell death may play a key role in a number of neurodegenerative diseases, and halting this aberrant cell death may halt disease progression. Kinases identified in cell death pathways may be attractive targets for neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, the authors will focus on three families of related mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), namely, the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs), the c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and the p38 MAPKs. The evidence for activation of each of these pathways in disease states and in models of neurodegenerative disorders will be examined. Effects of inhibitors, where available, will be discussed, and potential problems and side effects of kinase inhibitors as therapeutics will be addressed.
Key findings
- For some diseases such as Parkinson's disease, there are currently only palliative therapies, and for others such as Alzheimer's disease there are no proven therapies on the market that have any significant impact on disease progression.
- Recent work has suggested that cell death may play a key role in a number of neurodegenerative diseases, and halting this aberrant cell death may halt disease progression.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Expert opinion on therapeutic targets) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12667097) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Harper, S. J., & Wilkie, N. (2003). MAPKs: new targets for neurodegeneration. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.7.2.187
Vancouver
Harper SJ, Wilkie N. MAPKs: new targets for neurodegeneration. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2003. doi:10.1517/14728222.7.2.187. PMID: 12667097.
BibTeX
@article{harper2003-12667097,
author = {Harper, S. J. and Wilkie, N.},
title = {{MAPKs: new targets for neurodegeneration}},
journal = {Expert opinion on therapeutic targets},
year = {2003},
doi = {10.1517/14728222.7.2.187},
pmid = {12667097},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.7.2.187}
}
Related studies in End-of-life care
Also tagged “mitochondrial”
275 studies in the library carry the topic tag “mitochondrial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 275 tagged studies.