This search located 10,338 individual references, of which 164 are included in this review. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
During the 12-year follow-up period, 61 participants (7.8%) had a reported hypoglycemic event, and 148 (18.9%) developed dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 783 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
These findings suggest a potential vasculoprotective role of vitamin D. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 318 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cardiovascular risk factors often cluster into a metabolic syndrome that may increase the risk of dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Future well-designed longitudinal researches examining the direct and indirect relationship between tooth loss and dementia risk are encouraged. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of dementia increases exponentially with age. 1 key finding →
Participants: 7,528 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
Current evidence supports that DM is associated with increased risk for selected geriatric conditions. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We used Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regressions to assess whether circadian disturbances predict an increased risk of incident Alzheimer's dementia and conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early event in Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,908 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
The association between blood pressure and dementia is debated. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 6,668 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Unsaturated fatty acids are important constituents of neuronal cell membranes and have neuroprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,289 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We observed 234 cases of all-cause dementia over 10 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,457 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Numerous studies have investigated the impacts of common types of chronic pain (CP) on patients' cognitive function and observed that CP was associated with later dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 354,943 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Differences between users and non-users of insulin, metformin and sulfonylurea were assessed in each cohort for cognitive and brain MRI measures using linear regression models, and cognitive decline and dementia/AD risk using mixed effect models and Cox regression analyses, respectively. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,590 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We analyzed data from 11,709 participants without a history of coronary heart disease or stroke who attended the baseline examination (1987-1989) of the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 11,709 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
Understanding how dementia risk is impacted by timing of smoking cessation has public health implications for prevention efforts. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,347 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The association between patterns of physical/mental activity and dementia and how it is affected by disease susceptibility remains unknown. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is a distressing neurocognitive disorder recently linked to sleep disturbances. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 818 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The objective of this study was to investigate whether increased NLR in older adults is independently associated with the risk of subsequent dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,648 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Obesity has been consistently associated with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,304 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A total of 8870 cases of all-cause dementia were observed over a median 13.9-year follow-up. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 782 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 736 patients (245 [33%] female, mean age 68·0 years [SD 11·2], median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 3 [IQR 1-5]), 557 (76%) were followed up until death or the end of the study, and 706 (96%) contributed to the PSD analysis. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 736 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 1,979,509 participants (mean age, 49.0 years; 51.3% men; 50.7% with MetS) were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,979,509 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
62/100
This study included 1526 early adult-life (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [4.7] years; 821 [53.8%] female), 1943 midlife (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [5.8] years; 1010 [52.0%] female), and 885 late-life (mean [SD] age, 71.0 [4.5] years; 473 [53.4%] female) participants. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,526 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 13 592 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.34 [9.39] years; 7175 [52.8%] female), 6525 (48.0%) experienced possible childhood loneliness, and 565 (4.2%) reported childhood loneliness. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 592 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From across this tag
10 of the 1,131 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
- The temporal trend and distribution characteristics in mortality of Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia in China: Based on the National Mortality Surveillance System (NMS) from 2009 to 2015
- Relationship between Residential Segregation, Later-Life Cognition, and Incident Dementia across Race/Ethnicity
- Recombinant zoster vaccine is associated with a reduced risk of dementia
- Age-related hearing impairment-a risk factor and frailty marker for dementia and AD
- Racial/ethnic differences in dementia risk among older type 2 diabetic patients: the diabetes and aging study
- Risk score for the prediction of dementia risk in 20 years among middle aged people: a longitudinal, population-based study
- Determinants of dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia
- Sleepiness, sleep time, and depression of caregivers are linked with sleep and behaviors of their paired partners with dementia
- Affective disorders and risk of developing dementia: systematic review
- Amyloid pathology and modifiable risk factors in cognitive decline among cognitively unimpaired older adults
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →