Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has become a matrix for biomarker discovery and development in recent years. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has become a matrix for biomarker discovery and development in recent years. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Despite significant changes in the clinical measures consistent with progression of the disease, no significant overall change in CSF tau levels (548 +/- 355 vs. 557 +/- 275 pg/mL, NS) was observed. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In view of current (AChE inhibitors) and future (e.g. anti-Aβ aggregators), development and evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has become a rapidly growing research field. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biological markers may be of valuable help in the diagnosis of dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the diagnostic workup of relatively young dementia patients, CSF NFL levels may play a role in the discrimination between FTLD and EAD, especially in combination with Abeta42 and p-tau181 analysis. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A majority of current disease-modifying therapeutic approaches for age-related neurodegenerative diseases target their characteristic proteopathic lesions (α-synuclein, Tau, Aβ). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The quantification of mRNA in postmortem human brain is often made complicated by confounding factors. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The objective of this study was to compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of the light subtype of the neurofilament proteins (NFL), tau, and beta-amyloid42 (Abeta42) in individuals with moderate or severe white matter changes (WMC) and in those with mild or no WMC. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Tau proteins and amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides are the current recognized cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers used as an aid in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are increasingly used in research centers, clinical trials, and clinical settings. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We performed unbiased analysis of steroid-related compounds to identify novel Alzheimer's disease (AD) plasma biomarkers using liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectroscopy. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is currently based on clinical and neuropsychological examination. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A nanoscale optical biosensor based on localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) spectroscopy has been developed to monitor the interaction between the antigen, amyloid-beta derived diffusible ligands (ADDLs), and specific anti-ADDL antibodies. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
By comparing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteome between Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and controls, it may be possible to identify proteins that play a role in the disease process and thus to study the pathogenesis of AD. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
X-34, a lipophilic, highly fluorescent derivative of Congo red, was examined as a histochemical stain for pathological changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive mental disorder disease, which affects 26.6 million people worldwide and estimated increments can be 100 millions by 2050. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Early diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's (AD) or Parkinson's disease (PD) is needed to slow down or halt the disease at the earliest stage. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There is an urgent need for Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers-especially in the context of clinical trials. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The design and application of sensors for monitoring biomolecules in clinical samples is a common goal of the sensing research community. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
At baseline, higher AgeAccelPheno was associated with lower amyloid-β42 to amyloid-β40 (Aβ42:Aβ40) ratio, and higher AgeAccelGrim2 was associated with elevated neurofilament light (NfL). 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood-based biomarkers have expanded access to biologically supported diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly through measurement of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau species1-3. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Epigenetic clocks can predict pathological aging associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, albeit findings are mixed regarding if clocks are predictive in blood and in non-European populations. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Biological staging of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may improve diagnostic and prognostic work-up of dementia in clinical practice and the design of clinical trials. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 426 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings support a model in which p-tau217 specifically tracks amyloid-driven pathological progression, while markers of neurodegeneration reflect broader age-related processes that are not associated with APOE genotype. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology accumulates years before overt cognitive impairment, yet its multidomain phenotype remains poorly defined. 2 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 698 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →