27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Performance was assessed in comparison to clinical diagnosis (blinded to plasma results) and amyloid status (CSF/PET). 4 key findings →
Participants: 268 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
AD was common in both AD-related syndromes (110/125 [88%]) and FTLD-related syndromes (45/198 [23%]). 2 key findings →
Participants: 125 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The pTau217/Aβ42 ratio demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.927 (0.900-0.954). 3 key findings →
Participants: 423 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest an association of sHHV infection with white matter volume loss, attentional decline, and astrogliosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 119 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CSF Aβ 42 and PiB PET showed maximal correlation when collected within 6 years of each other ( R ≈ -0.5). 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 371 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher baseline p-tau181 and NfL were associated with significantly faster decline in most cognitive, physical, and functional outcomes (+1 SD p-tau181: β MMSE = -0.055, 95% CI -0.067 to -0.043, β FCSRT = -0.034, 95% CI -0.043 to -0.025, β fluency = -0.029, 95% CI -0.038 to -0.020, β SPPB = -0.040, 95% CI -0.057 to -0.022, and β 4IADL = -0.115, 95% CI 0.091-0.140. +1 SD NfL: β MMSE = -0.039, 95% CI -0.053 to -0.025, β FCSRT = -0.022, 95% CI -0.032 to -0.012, β fluency = -0.014, 95% CI -0.024 to -0.004, and β 4IADL = 0.077, 95% CI 0.048-0.105). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,938 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among the 12 biomarkers, only pTau was higher in frail individuals than in their not-frail peers (471.3 ± 58.1 pg/mL vs. 451.9 ± 61.1 pg/mL, p = 0.022). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 313 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma β-synuclein demonstrated discriminative properties for Aβ PET positive and negative subjects. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 51 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that promoting CVH in older adults may help alleviate the burden of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly among Black adults, who are known to experience a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,018 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of this study indicate that the DMN abnormalities observed in patients with AD represent an accelerated aging pattern of connectivity compared with matched controls. 3 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These initial data suggest that serum protein-based biomarkers can be combined with clinical information to accurately classify AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 197 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In addition to known candidate genes, APOE, TOMM40, and one hypothetical gene LOC100129500 partially overlapping APOE; one novel gene, EPC2, and several other interesting genes were associated with CSF biomarkers that are related to AD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 374 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previous estimates of the utility of polygenic risk score analysis for the prediction of Alzheimer disease have given area under the curve (AUC) estimates of <80%. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Arterial stiffness, measured by PWV, is an emerging risk factor for dementia through its repeated relationships with cognition, cSVD, and Aβ deposition. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean (SD) age at death was statistically significantly younger for participants who had AD with Lewy bodies (77.9 [9.5] years) than for participants who had AD without Lewy bodies (80.2 [11.1] years) (P = .01). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Psychotic symptoms occur in ~40% of subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are associated with more rapid cognitive decline and increased functional deficits. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The 751 study participants were older (median age [interquartile range], 87 years [51-105 years]), 395 (54%) were women, and 324 (44%) were APOE ε4 carriers. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 604 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium following surgery is common and associated with adverse outcomes. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 282 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Memory loss is one of the first symptoms of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), for which there are no effective therapies available. 3 key findings →
Participants: 14 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
AV45 PET scans were performed in 271 individuals and preliminary results showed that 38.0% had a cortical SUVR > 1.17, which gave an indication of significant brain amyloïd deposit. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,680 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
1680 participants were randomized over the recruitment period in MAPT study. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,680 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Subjects receiving the activity specific exercise program improved in ability to perform transfers, whereas subjects in the other 2 groups declined. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Earlier NH admission of Australian compared to U.K. and U.S. subjects may be due to differences in health care, NH systems, availability, and affordability. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Environmental enrichment may slow cognitive decay possibly acting through an improvement in vascular function. 2 key findings →
Participants: 55 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The design decisions made for ADMET are important elements to be considered in trials assessing the safety and efficacy of medications for clinically significant apathy in Alzheimer disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →