Lewy body dementia is the second most common form of neurodegenerative dementia, following Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
At baseline, participants were aged 70-95 years (mean: 75.2 ± 4.3), with 54% being women. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This review covers recent advances (2023-2024) in neuroimaging research into the pathophysiology, progression, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma from individuals with a higher WMH burden was associated with increased BBB disruption in hBMEC. 5 key findings →
Participants: 155 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In mid-life, the sample sizes ranged from 4100 in 2022 to 5589 in 2017-18 and in late-life from 2799 in 2011-12 to 3762 in 2017-18. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher GCA was associated with lower dementia risk (hazard ratio = 0.865, 95% confidence interval = 0.756 to 0.990). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Novel insights into Alzheimer's disease through the study of individuals with Down syndromePeople with Down syndrome (DS) represent the largest genetically defined population at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 Virtually all adults with DS develop AD neuropathology by midlife due to triplication of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene on chromosome 21.As medical advances and social integration have extended life expectancy into the 60s, AD has emerged as the major determinant of cognitive decline, morbidity, and mortality in this DS population. 2 What was once viewed as an inevitable consequence of aging in DS is now recognized as a unique scientific opportunity to uncover the earliest events that drive AD.The predictable and accelerated course of DS-associated AD (DSAD) provides an unparalleled window into the molecular and cellular origins of amyloid and tau pathology, neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular pathology, and neurodegeneration. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
47/100
These findings provide no evidence of a group-level Alzheimer-related p-tau217 elevation in young people with DSRD and support DSRD as a condition distinct from Alzheimer’s disease. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 132 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In bvFTD patients, longer interoceptive-ACWs than controls were observed in the bilateral fronto-temporal and parietal regions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
47/100
We show reduced fiber cross-section in LBD versus PD, and increased concentrations of plasma neurofilament light chain and p-tau217; with p-tau217 and fiber cross-section associated with cognition. 5 key findings →
Participants: 47 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 1388 studies identified, 70 met the inclusion criteria for this review. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
• SCD patients showed attenuation of sensory (P1, N1, P2) and cognitive (P300, P600, P900) components, with performance-related gains. • MCI patients exhibited neural compensations, reversing the downward trend observed in SCD, which resulted in a non-monotonic pattern of ERPs. • The progression of cognitive decline was linked to electrophysiological discontinuity, suggesting resilience mechanisms in both low and higher order cognitive regions. 5 key findings →
Participants: 178 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
47/100
Of the participants, 25, 92, and 61 were classified as cognitively normal, with mild cognitive impairment, and with dementia, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
SSRI treatment showed no significant effect on AD dementia progression (hazard ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 4.38) or cognitive trajectories, regardless of AD pathology. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is increasingly recognised as a potential preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease, yet the physiological mechanisms underlying its progression remain poorly understood. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The relation between vitamin A (VA) level and cognitive function and the underlying mechanisms have not been thoroughly investigated. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,817 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
As of a data cutoff of December 3, 2024, 243 participants were screened and 197 randomized in DIAN-TU-001 Tau NexGen trial (Cohort 1: 97; Cohort 2: 100). 5 key findings →
Participants: 243 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There are many reports about the comorbidity of NPH and other neurodegenerative diseases1–3; the primary findings in neuropathological studies of patients with NPH include amyloid plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau protein inclusions.2,4 This suggests that proteinopathy may be one of the potential causes of NPH. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 50 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Apathy was significantly more prevalent in dementia and MCI patients compared to HC. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 200 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Epidemiological studies consistently indicate a two- to threefold increased risk of dementia among individuals with schizophrenia, although estimates vary due to diagnostic and ascertainment biases. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study reveals that PS in DLB is associated with specific deficits in attention and visuospatial/executive function, alongside more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 35 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Two clusters were identified in the microbiota at the phylum level that showed significant differences on a few microbiotas phylum. 4 key findings →
Participants: 292 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia risk is influenced by the social conditions in which people live. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our results elucidate the characteristics and genetic associations of p‐tau217 in a population‐based setting. 4 key findings →
Participants: 697 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Emerging research found air pollution may be associated with incident Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →