27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This review included 24 studies involving 2979 participants (1717 with dysphagia and 1262 controls). 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 24 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2556 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years; 56% women), delirium occurred in 957 (37%). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,556 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Critical outcomes were rate of falls (number of falls per unit time) and number of fallers (risk of experiencing one or more falls). 5 key findings →
Participants: 104 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In those aged 65 years or older, delirium was overall associated (all p<0·001, age and sex adjusted) with dementia ( adj OR 3·63 [95% CI 2·65–4·98]), pre-admission dependency (2·63 [2·02–3·43]), comorbidity burden (1·04 [1·02–1·05]), and frailty (moderate vs low risk 3·62 [2·70–4·85] and high vs low risk 11·85 [7·24–19·42]), with stronger associations in patients without comorbid dementia than in those with comorbid dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 290 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 62 RCTs comprising 200,068 participants were included. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 200,068 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Out of 929 patients, 184 (20%) experienced POD. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 929 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We identified 30 studies reporting health outcomes following hip fracture. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our sample included 11,105 patients (median age 77, 51% female), with 2299 in the hallway group and 8806 in the non-hallway group. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 11,105 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Clinical characteristics and demographics were similar between groups. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 89 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 689 participants, CI was associated with delirium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.31, 9.49, P-value = 0.009), 90-day complications (aOR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.14, 4.28, P-value = 0.015), and 90-day composite adverse outcomes (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.81, P-value = 0.033). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 689 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Outcomes of interest were duration of delirium, health-related quality of life, delirium severity, cognitive function, mortality in the ICU, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay and adverse events. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 491 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
PLWD also commonly experience social isolation (Shen et al., 2022), poorer physical function (Jehu et al., 2024a), worsened behavioral and psychological symptoms (Cerejeira et al., 2012), poorer quality of life (Cerejeira et al., 2012), and reduced access to healthcare (Mitchell et al., 2016) compared to older adults without dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Anemia among older adults aged ≥ 60 years is a well-described risk factor that increases the risk of falls, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 3,252 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Ultimately, 10,373 participants were included in the analysis. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 10,373 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
1,318 unique titles and abstracts were screened, of which 20 articles met inclusion criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 12,132 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It remains a common yet underrecognised complication in older surgical patients, significantly influencing recovery, prolonging hospital stays and increasing healthcare costs and workload.1 Although traditionally peri-operative care has prioritised physical stabilisation, effectively addressing POD requires a holistic approach that also considers patients’ emotional and social well being.2 One well established strategy for managing delirium is the active involvement of family and caregivers. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
DAGs provide visual representations of assumptions made, and provide an objective approach to appropriate statistical adjustments. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Across several cohorts, delirium is emerging as an important prognostic signal, independent of chronic markers of baseline morbidity, that identifies patients at markedly increased risk of death or future dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,556 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although intraoperative hypotension initially appeared to be associated with postoperative delirium, this association was no longer significant when accounting for temporal improvements in perioperative care. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,171 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened a working group to review data on amyloid imaging related abnormalities (ARIA) in response to concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration. 3 key findings →
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Out of 3867 papers identified, 106 were included. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ICU delirium is also associated with increased mortality and dementia in the longer term. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In older adults, trazodone is frequently prescribed for anxiety and insomnia owing to its perceived greater tolerability in comparison with benzodiazepines. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 123 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia prevalence was 22%, with 35% undiagnosed. 4 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 2,003 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The MAINTAIN intervention demonstrated high fidelity in home assessments and intervention delivery, with participants receiving a mean of 15 of the 22 available sessions with a range of 5-25 sessions. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →