Elevated FSH and reduced LH may be associated with poorer cognition and an increased risk of AD-D in very old Chinese adults, particularly in males. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 509
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
In MCI and dementia, the HTS is an ecologically valid non-canonical sign, frequently occurs in daily life too, associated with longer disease duration and spatial disorientation. 2 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort
Participants: 71
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Routine liver–metabolic indices were associated with cognitive performance, while FIB-4 stage showed effect modification by APOE ε4 in relation to both cognition and amyloid PET SUVR. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 507
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
In the ADMET2 biomarker subset (n = 44, MPH:21, age:75 years, MMSE:20.2), higher baseline TNF was associated with higher M6 NPI-A [B(SE)= 6.86 (1.71), p = .0003], and multivariable models found lower baseline TNF [B(SE)= 8.28(1.61), p < .001] and higher baseline S100B [B(SE)= -6.41(1.95), p = .002] were associated with lower M6 NPI-A. Exploratory analyses suggested that higher baseline NfL significantly interacted with treatment to predict lower M6 NPI-A [B(SE)= -8.36(4.21), p = .05], only when adjusting for cognition. 5 key findings →
Participants: 44
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The CES-D scale is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Global staging measures for dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) assess the influence of cognitive loss on the ability to conduct everyday activities and represent the "ultimate test" of efficacy for antidementia drug trials.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Thematic analysis is a poorly demarcated, rarely acknowledged, yet widely used qualitative analytic method within psychology.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) has a score range of 0 to 100 and provides quantitative assessment on attention, concentration, orientation, short-term memory, long-term memory, language abilities, visual construction, list-generating fluency, abstraction, and judgment.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measures global cognitive performance and is often used as a screening test for dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
It has been shown that atrophy of medial temporal lobe structures such as the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex shown on MRI may distinguish patients with Alzheimer's disease from healthy controls. 4 key findings →
Participants: 41
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Reliability of quantitative gait assessment while dual-tasking (walking while doing a secondary task such as talking) in people with cognitive impairment is unknown. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
50/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100.
·
NeuroImage
·
2008-02-21
Tensor-based morphometry (TBM) creates three-dimensional maps of disease-related differences in brain structure, based on nonlinearly registering brain MRI scans to a common image template. 4 key findings →
Participants: 120
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Pilot studies applying a humanoid robot (NAO), a pet robot (PARO) and a real animal (DOG) in therapy sessions of patients with dementia in a nursing home and a day care center. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial
Participants: 101
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Disease-modifying treatment trials are increasingly advanced to the prodromal or preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and inclusion criteria are based on biomarkers rather than clinical symptoms. 4 key findings →
Participants: 13
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Elevated CSF τ is considered a biomarker of neuronal injury in newly developed Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) criteria. 4 key findings →
Participants: 24
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Hypothyroidism and subclinical hyperthyroidism have both been associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,047
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
50/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100.
·
Medicina
·
2025-11-06
Participants showed a significantly slower rate of cognitive decline than expected from the AD reference rate (p < 0.001), with many demonstrating stabilized ADAS-Cog scores during their respective treatment periods, ranging from 1 to 3 years. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A total of 101 FTD patients (64 ± 8 years, 53 men), 230 AD patients (65 ± 10 years, 84 men), and 173 CTR (59 ± 15 years, 67 men) were studied. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 101
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
We included 3074 AD patients (mean age 78.1 years; 59.4% women), of whom 1028 used statins (79.6% simvastatin, 20.4% atorvastatin). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 3,074
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Parkinsonian syndrome related to intravenous use of a "designer" psychostimulant, derived from pseudoephedrine using potassium permanganate as the oxidant, has been observed in drug addicts in Estonia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
While the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was originally developed to screen for dementia and delirium, many neurologists use this measure as a screening instrument for 'cognitive impairment' in hospitalized stroke patients. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Magnetic resonance based volumetric measures of hippocampal formation, amygdala (A), caudate nucleus (CN), normalised for total intracranial volume (TIV), were analysed in relation to measures of cognitive deterioration and specific features of memory functions in 18 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Participants: 18
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Memory clinic patients were administered the MoCA, MMSE, and a comprehensive formal neuropsychological battery. 4 key findings →
Participants: 36
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
As the population ages, it is increasingly important to use effective short cognitive tests for suspected dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
49/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100.
·
PloS one
·
2014-10-27
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) therapy have an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, which are known relevant factors in disease prognosis and therapeutic success, but still lack adequate screening in clinical routine. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.