Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

H. cheirifolia phenolic extracts exhibit potent, mechanism-specific antioxidant activity and promising AChE inhibition, validating traditional use in neurological complaints. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Treatment Effects of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Alzheimer’s Disease: a Causal Machine Learning Approach

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-02-12

A bstract INTRODUCTION Treatment response in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) varies substantially across patients, yet no validated frameworks exist to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) from observational data while controlling for confounding bias. 2 key findings →

Participants: 4,049 Evidence: low

Real-World Performance of Urine β-amyloid Test Kits in Multiple Hospital Clinics and Neighborhood Communities of China

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-05-15

Our findings confirm the diagnostic value of urinary β-amyloid protein detection in MCI and AD-related dementia. 5 key findings →

Design: case-control study Participants: 51,187 Evidence: high

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) are central regulators of synaptic homeostasis, plasticity, and dysfunction during Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Computational Screening of 1,348 FDA-Approved Drugs as Potential BACE1 Inhibitors for Alzheimer's Disease Drug Repurposing

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-07-28

Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains one of the most devastating and economically costly neurological conditions of the modern era, affecting over 55 million individuals worldwide with no approved disease-modifying therapy. 3 key findings →

Participants: 1,348 Evidence: low

Neurodegenerative diseases are a major threat to older adults and represent a growing global health burden as the elderly population continues to expand. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION This study examined the extent to which educational attainment, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) knowledge, and research attitudes are associated with willingness to participate in AD research, and whether AD knowledge and research attitudes mediate associations between educational attainment and willingness to participate. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Chronic trazodone treatment consolidates sleep, improves memory, and reduces amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-25

Sleep disturbance in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), particularly the reduction of slow wave sleep (SWS), has been proposed as a novel therapeutic target, with disease-modifying potential. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea may contribute to long-term stabilisation of memory in Alzheimer's and vascular dementia

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-10

Controlling for baseline differences, treatment of OSA improved delayed recall and may reduce the slope of memory decline in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. 3 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 86 Evidence: moderate

The influence of cognitive decline on the severity and quantity of drug-drug interactions

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-11

These findings indicate that cognitive impairment may mark a population vulnerable to medication complexity rather than independently driving DDI risk, with polypharmacy emerging as the principal modifiable determinant. 4 key findings →

Participants: 101 Evidence: low

Cortisol is primarily synthesized by the adrenal glands, but also within specific tissues via a distinct enzymatic pathway. 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) catalyses the synthesis of cortisol within cells to create local higher cortisol environments in those organs where it is highly expressed such as the liver and brain. 4 key findings →

Participants: 247 Evidence: low

These findings identify restoration of hippocampal transcript fate and splice-isoform selection as a mechanism potentially underlying A. muciniphila -mediated protection against Cd neurotoxicity, and establish post-transcriptional RNA regulation as a gut-brain target for mitigating environmentally driven neurotoxicity. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Induction of ferroptotic and amyloidogenic signatures linked to Alzheimer’s disease by chemically distinct air pollutants

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-01-07

Air pollution (AirP) exposure is associated with increased Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk, yet AirP is chemically heterogeneous, complicating identification of shared pathogenic drivers. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

FDA-approved carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have shown robust efficacy in reducing amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology, neurodegeneration, and cerebrovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) models, highlighting carbonic anhydrase (CAs) as a promising, previously untapped therapeutic target for AD and vascular contribution to dementia. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Repeated VU0155069 Treatment Is Associated with Region- and Pathological Stage-Specific Dendritic Spine Remodeling in Female 3xTg-AD Mice

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-27

VU0155069 engages circuit- and pathological stage-specific forms of dendritic spine remodeling across distributed recognition- and associative-memory networks. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a widely prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive impairment and neuropathological alterations. 5 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementias in Long-Term Care: A Real-World EHR Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-01-19

More than one-quarter of residents with ADRD remain untreated with guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy, and treatment varied significantly by non-clinical predictors. 5 key findings →

Participants: 359,801 Evidence: low

From across this tag

10 of the 3,607 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed    Where this research is being discussed: events