27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Herbal therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in cognition and memory, which were similar to the donepezil in patients with aMCI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 216 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall, statin drugs appear to be safe for use in the vast majority of patients. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common motor disorder affecting the elderly. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Upon initiation of guanfacine, patients with delirium had a reduction in daily antipsychotic exposure and a decrease in positive delirium screens. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 56 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the last 2 years, there have been 3 successful trials of antiamyloid antibodies in Alzheimer disease (AD): aducanemab, now controversially US Food and Drug Administration-approved under the accelerated approval pathway1; lecanemab, now FDA-approved2; and donanemab, now going through the approval process.3 All 3 share a common broad mechanism, that is, antibody-mediated removal of β-amyloid (Aβ) from the brain, and this is almost certainly the basis of their therapeutic action.4 When used in the earliest symptomatic stages of AD, all have modest clinical effects, all clear Aβ from the brain, and all show evidence for some changes in molecular markers believed to be downstream of Aβ accumulation in keeping with disease modification.4 However, all these drugs-and several other antiamyloid immunotherapies that failed to show positive effects in clinical trials (e.g. bapineuzemab and gantenerumab)5,6-have the troubling adverse event of antibody-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Microglia constitute the primary resident immune surveillance cell in the brain and are thought to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and HIV-associated dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 64 patients were enrolled in this ongoing real-world study. 5 key findings →
Participants: 64 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), aducanumab and lecanemab, have received accelerated approval from the US FDA for initiation of treatment in early Alzheimer's disease patients who have proven β-amyloid pathology (Aβ). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) stands as the predominant form of dementia, presenting significant and escalating global challenges. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects over 6 million people over the age of 65. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Donanemab is an amyloid-targeting therapy that resulted in robust amyloid plaque reduction and slowed Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression compared with placebo in the phase II TRAILBLAZER-ALZ study (NCT03367403). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The targeting of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques therapeutically as one of the primary causes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia has been an ongoing effort spanning decades. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our study has established a significant link between CAA-Aβ antibody immune complex formation, immune activation and vascular damage leading to smooth muscle cell loss. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The emerging class of bispecific antibodies represents a significant advancement in Alzheimer's disease (AD) immunotherapy by addressing the limited brain concentrations achieved with conventional monoclonal antibodies. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Anti-amyloid mAbs consistently demonstrated robust amyloid clearance and modest slowing of clinical decline in early symptomatic AD. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Recent advancements in Alzheimer's disease treatment have focused on the elimination of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaque, a hallmark of the disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The development of humanized IgG1 anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, such as lecanemab, provides a promising novel treatment pathway with potential disease-modifying effects for patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Lecanemab (product name Leqembi®) is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment approved for use in Korea for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, were originally described by dementia care experts. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Food and Drug Administration granted traditional approval of lecanemab for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid beta, which is strongly associated with disease progression and cognitive decline. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder pathologically characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau in the brain. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes and obesity was followed by data establishing the cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA in select patient populations. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Lecanemab is an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, recently approved in the UK as a treatment for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in adults who are apolipoprotein E ε4 gene (APOE4) heterozygotes or non-carriers.A group of UK neurologists, old age psychiatrists and geriatricians with expertise in AD convened to agree appropriate use recommendations for lecanemab in UK clinical practice. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The recent advent of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies has introduced new demands for MRI-based screening of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, particularly the hemorrhage subtype (ARIA-H). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 468 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →