Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Long-term exposure to PM 2.5 contributed to the development of cognitive decline, which may be partly explained by brain amyloid accumulation indicative of increased AD risk. 1 key finding →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 31,573 Evidence: moderate

Dual Sensory Impairment and Cognitive Impairment in the Korean Longitudinal Elderly Cohort

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Neurology 2021-04-07

At baseline, DSI was significantly associated with increased dementia prevalence compared to normal sensory function (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-4.02), but SSI was not (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.41). 4 key findings →

Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate

Higher chronic exposure to SO2 was associated with a faster decline in memory score, whereas chronic exposure to CO, NO2 , and PM10 were not associated with the rate of cognitive decline. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 269 Evidence: moderate

Traumatic Brain Injury, Seizures, and Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. JAMA network open 2024-08-01

Among the cohort of 7180 older adults (median age, 74 years [range, 65-102 years]; 4729 women [65.9%]), 1036 were African American or Black (14.4%), 21 were American Indian or Alaska Native (0.3%), 143 were Asian (2.0%), 332 were Hispanic (4.6%), and 5648 were non-Hispanic White (78.7%); the median educational level was 16.0 years (range, 1.0-29.0 years). 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate

Pharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Annals of Internal Medicine 2000-07-04

DeFronzo Metrics Cited ByDiscovery of α-Glucosidase Inhibitors from Marine Microorganisms: Optimization of Culture Conditions and Medium CompositionBurdock fructooligosaccharide as an α-glucosidase inhibitor and its antidiabetic effect on high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced diabetic miceThe antioxidant and antidiabetic potentials of polyphenolic-rich extracts of Cyperus rotundus (Linn.)From Pharmacogenetics to Gene Expression: Implications for Precision Medicine in DiabetesA narrative review of current trends in liraglutide: insights into the unmet needs in management of type 2 diabetes and obesitySynthesis, antidiabetic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of novel hydroxytriazenes based on sulpha drugsRNA-Seq Analysis of the Liver Transcriptome Reveals the Networks Regulating Treatment of Sitagliptin Phosphate plus Fuzhujiangtang Granule in the Zucker Diabetic Fatty RatsEverestmab, a novel long-acting GLP-1/anti GLP-1R nanobody fusion protein, exerts potent anti-diabetic effectsSPION‐Decorated Exosome Delivered BAY55‐9837 Targeting the Pancreas through Magnetism to Improve the Blood GLC ResponseA novel self-sufficient biocatalyst based on transaminase and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate covalent co-immobilization and its application in continuous biosynthesis of sitagliptinShared Pathological Mechanisms Between Diabetes Mellitus and Neurodegenerative DiseasesEffects of Lifestyle Modification and Anti-diabetic Medicine on Prediabetes Progress: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisGlibenclamide Reduces Primary Human Monocyte Functions Against Tuberculosis Infection by Enhancing M2 PolarizationNaringin enhances reverse cholesterol transport in high fat/low streptozocin induced diabetic ratsA novel strategy to prepare the precursor peptide of liraglutideImpact of metformin on patients with advanced head and neck cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapyEffects of Different Doses of Metformin on Serum Fatty Acid Composition in Type 2 Diabetic RatsInsulin resistance and cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes — The Maastricht studyDesign and synthesis of novel thiazolidine-2,4-diones as hypoglycemic agentsMetformin in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results of a Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical TrialMetformin and lifestyle modification in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysisGlibenclamide reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production by neutrophils of diabetes patients in response to bacterial infectionNa + /H

Design: systematic review Evidence: high

A Comparison of the Prevalence of Dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. JAMA Internal Medicine 2017-01-01

Comparing two nationally representative surveys of older Americans 12 years apart, researchers found the share of seniors with dementia fell substantially, from 11.6% in 2000 to 8.8% in 2012. 4 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21,057 Evidence: high

By pooling two long-running community studies from the same region of Pennsylvania, researchers compared dementia rates across people born in different decades, from the 1900s to the 1940s. Each successively younger birth cohort had a substantially lower risk of developing dementia at a given age, with the youngest group's risk about a quarter of the oldest group's. This adds US evidence, independent of Framingham, that generational health improvements are lowering dementia risk. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 3,010 Evidence: high

Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: 23 year follow-up of Whitehall II cohort study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. BMJ 2018-08-01

This 23-year study found a U-shaped relationship between alcohol and dementia risk: people who abstained from alcohol in midlife, as well as those who drank heavily (more than 14 units, about 14 standard drinks, per week), both had a higher risk of developing dementia than people who drank moderately. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 9,087 Evidence: moderate

Among older adults with diabetes, no clear evidence was found that the incidence of dementia differed overall between patients using GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 7,254 Evidence: early

Compared with non-users, SGLT-2i, GLP-1RA, TZD and metformin were associated with the reduced risk of dementia in patients with T2D. SGLT-2i, and GLP-1RA may serve as the optimal choice to improve the cognitive prognosis in patients with T2D. 5 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Participants: 3,462,926 Evidence: moderate

Smoking Cessation, Weight Change, and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Neurology 2026-05-20

Smoking cessation was associated with a sustained lower dementia risk and slower cognitive decline, comparable to never smokers and those without short-term risk increase. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 32,802 Evidence: moderate

Visual Impairment, Eye Conditions, and Diagnoses of Neurodegeneration and Dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. JAMA Network Open 2024-07-01

In this cohort and MR study of UK Biobank participants, cataracts were associated with increased risk of dementia, especially vascular dementia, and reduced total brain volumes. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 304,953 Evidence: moderate

Alongside APOE ε4, iPRS-DEM may refine risk stratification for the enrichment of dementia clinical trials and prevention programs. 3 key findings →

Design: cohort Participants: 241,935 Evidence: moderate

Cancer linked to Alzheimer disease but not vascular dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Neurology 2009-12-23

In white older adults, prevalent Alzheimer disease (AD) was longitudinally associated with a reduced risk of cancer, and a history of cancer was associated with a reduced risk of AD. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 3,020 Evidence: moderate

Metformin should continue to be used as a first line therapy for diabetes in patients at risk of developing dementia or Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high

From across this tag

9 of the 3,281 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 9. The same 9 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed