31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
In this study, hearing loss was positively associated with a risk of dementia, especially in patients aged 45 to 64 years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 8,135 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Central obesity in midlife increases risk of dementia independent of diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,049 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Midlife and late-life risk factors contributed to 22.7% and 16.5% of total dementia cases, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 37,931 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Pooled HRs indicated depression present in late-life (HR 1.95, 95% CI: 1.68–2.26; I 2 = 77.5%) and midlife (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12–2.18; I 2 = 97.5%) significantly increased risk of all-cause dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 901,762 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Seventeen risk/protective factors met criteria for the algorithm to estimate risk for any dementia including age, sex, education, hypertension, midlife obesity, midlife high cholesterol, diabetes, insufficient physical activity, depression, traumatic brain injury, atrial fibrillation, smoking, social engagement, cognitive engagement, fish consumption (diet), stroke, and insomnia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Baseline subjective cognitive decline and low cognitive reserve significantly increased the risk of dementia, after 2 years of follow-up. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,099 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Late-life depression (LLD), compared to depression at a young age, is more likely to have poor prognosis and high risk of progression to dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 27 857 participants (mean [SD] age at baseline, 61 [10] years; 15 747 female participants [56.5%]; 19 249 non-Hispanic White participants [69.1%]), 4105 (14.7%) developed dementia during the follow-up period (mean [SD], 10.2 [5.6] years). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 857 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The relationship between body mass index (BMI) (in midlife and late-life) and dementia was investigated in meta-analyses of 16 articles reporting on 15 prospective studies. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 624 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Identified prognostic factors can help clinicians and policy makers in tailoring management strategies for patients with COVID-19 infectious disease while researchers can utilise our findings to develop multivariable prognostic models that could eventually facilitate decision-making and improve patient important outcomes. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 207 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A statistically significant age-adjusted association was observed between the A1C level and the score on all four cognitive tests. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 19 reviews containing 37 meta-analyses were included umbrella review. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 19 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older adults with hearing loss are at greater risk of dementia than those with normal hearing. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 7,865 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We carried out systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether peripheral levels of pro-inflammatory markers including Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF- α) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) are significantly higher in elderly with depression and Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Evidence suggests that lifelong cumulative exposure to pesticides may generate lasting toxic effects on the central nervous system and contribute to the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
As a result, kidney disease has been largely overlooked by health authorities and governments in most countries [9]. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Both overweight and obesity at midlife independently increase the risk of dementia, AD, and VaD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 350 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Both HL and depression are independent risk factors for eventual conversion to dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 8,529 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We have found evidence of a positive association between residential levels of air pollution across London and being diagnosed with dementia, which is unexplained by known confounding factors. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 978 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Air pollution is a modifiable and preventable factor, and it is a possible risk factor for dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Fifty-nine primary studies met all criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
HI and VI at baseline were reported by 30.3% and 16.6% of individuals, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,497 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 32,901 (1.12%) participants developed dementia, of which 74.4% and 11.0% were attributable to Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, respectively, during the median follow-up of 5.5 years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,930,816 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The total effect of cholesterol on risk of AD was significant and heterogeneous. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Thirty-one reviews were identified, sixteen of which were systematic reviews, and fifteen were meta-analyses. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events