27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Frailty, a critical intermediate status of the aging process that is at increased risk for negative health-related events, includes physical, cognitive, and psychosocial domains or phenotypes. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although statin use might be less frequent in those with prevalent dementia, we found no association between statin use and subsequent onset of dementia or AD. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,895 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These results should be confirmed with a randomized clinical trial of a centrally active ACE inhibitor in the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,054 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Some well-known risk factors for AD were confirmed in this study and potential new risk factors were identified. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 36 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Higher midlife fitness levels seem to be associated with lower hazards of developing all-cause dementia later in life. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
HZ vaccination is associated with reduced risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 136,016 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Changes to everyday spoken language ("connected language") are evident in persons with AD dementia, yet little is known about when these changes are first detectable on the continuum of cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 264 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 7170 prescreened papers, 12 met the inclusion criteria. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previous hypothesis-driven research has identified many risk factors linked to dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 344,324 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Identifying brain regions associated with risk factors for dementia could guide mechanistic understanding of risk factors associated with Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 8,312 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among the 11 risk factors, educational attainment has the greatest impact on dementia risk and cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 30,113 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Aging is associated with physiological changes that increase the risk of falls, impacting functional independence and quality of life. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 40 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The CITA GO-ON Study, as a part of the World-Wide FINGERS network, is designed to validate the efficacy of a multidomain lifestyle intervention for dementia prevention and contribute valuable data to inform public health strategies fostering healthy, active aging. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 1,051 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The traditional Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), rich in minimally processed plant foods and fish, has been widely recognized to be one of the healthiest diets. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total number of 450 participants (Mean age = 69.5 years; SD = 10.8) have been screened at different recruitment sites throughout the country, among whom 425 participants (94.4%) met the selection criteria. 2 key findings →
Participants: 450 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Promoting successful cognitive aging is a topic of major importance to individuals and the field of public health. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Delirium is a complex clinical syndrome characterised by disturbed consciousness, cognitive function, or perception. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our findings highlight the importance of personalized risk assessments and the development of tailored interventions based on genetic background to prevent dementia more effectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 182,473 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In the intention-to-treat analysis, dementia risk was not different between GLP1-RA and DPP4i initiators (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.04; rates: 6.29 versus 6.64 per 1000 person-years; mean follow-up: 6.54 years); however, continuous GLP1-RA versus DPP4i use was associated with a 21% lower risk (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97; rates: 3.64 versus 4.82; mean follow-up: 2.71 years). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 107,424 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Antihypertensive treatment significantly improved cognitive function scores (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.09; P Conclusions and implications Antihypertensive therapy significantly improves cognitive function with moderate certainty evidence, supporting its use for cognitive protection in older adults with hypertension. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 16,823 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Recent findings Both of these leisure-time activities were associated with significant reductions in the risk of dementia in longitudinal studies. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cross-sectional associations support the view that enhancing cognitive reserve may benefit cognition, and maintenance of cognitive health may be supported by a healthy and active lifestyle, in later life. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Interventions that have even quite modest effects at the individual level could drastically reduce the future burden of dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease at the population level. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The review demonstrates accumulating evidence supporting health behavioral effects in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 859 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →