Home › Research › Prevention trials
Programme Dementia Prevention (pdp): A Nationwide Program for Personalized Prevention in Luxembourg
Valerie E Schröder, Amna Skrozic, Dorothee Erz, Anne Kaysen, Joëlle V Fritz, Joao M Loureiro, Deborah McIntyre, Laure Pauly et al.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024
Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology
A total number of 450 participants (Mean age = 69.5 years; SD = 10.8) have been screened at different recruitment sites throughout the country, among whom 425 participants (94.4%) met the selection criteria. We provide evidence supporting the feasibility of implementing a nationwide dementia prevention program and achieving successful recruitment of the target population by establishing a network of different healthcare providers.
Key findings
- A total number of 450 participants (Mean age = 69.5 years; SD = 10.8) have been screened at different recruitment sites throughout the country, among whom 425 participants (94.4%) met the selection criteria.
- We provide evidence supporting the feasibility of implementing a nationwide dementia prevention program and achieving successful recruitment of the target population by establishing a network of different healthcare providers.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Participants450
- Effect size94.4%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 59/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 450 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38189752) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 33 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100. |
| Total | 59 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Schröder, V. E., Skrozic, A., Erz, D., Kaysen, A., Fritz, J. V., Loureiro, J. M., et al. (2024). Programme Dementia Prevention (pdp): A Nationwide Program for Personalized Prevention in Luxembourg. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-230794
Vancouver
Schröder VE, Skrozic A, Erz D, Kaysen A, Fritz JV, Loureiro JM, et al. Programme Dementia Prevention (pdp): A Nationwide Program for Personalized Prevention in Luxembourg. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2024. doi:10.3233/jad-230794. PMID: 38189752.
BibTeX
@article{schroder2024-38189752,
author = {Schröder, Valerie E and Skrozic, Amna and Erz, Dorothee and Kaysen, Anne and Fritz, Joëlle V and Loureiro, Joao M and McIntyre, Deborah and Pauly, Laure and others},
title = {{Programme Dementia Prevention (pdp): A Nationwide Program for Personalized Prevention in Luxembourg}},
journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.3233/jad-230794},
pmid = {38189752},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-230794}
}
Related studies in Prevention trials
Also tagged “costs”
265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “costs”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.