alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 251–275 of 460 studies in Cognitive tests and assessment · tagged Diagnosis (page 11 of 19) · 31,380 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 460 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Other subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

Institutions

From OpenAlex; 16,851 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.

What “Cognitive tests and assessment” covers

Cognitive tests and assessment — Memory and thinking tests, screening tools and rating scales: how well they measure what they claim to.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Digital cognitive assessments as low-burden markers for predicting future cognitive decline and tau accumulation across the Alzheimer's spectrum

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2024-09-06

Digital assessments are effective at identifying at-risk individuals, supporting their utility as low-burden tools for early AD detection and monitoring. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Feasibility and validity of the self-administered computerized assessment of mild cognitive impairment with older primary care patients

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 2014-10-01

We investigated whether a validated computerized cognitive test, the Computerized Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment (CAMCI), could be independently completed by older primary care patients. 1 key finding →

Participants: 130 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Peruvian validation and standardization of the TabCAT-brain health assessment

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Frontiers in public health 2025-08-29

By incorporating sex, place of residence, age, and years of education as covariates, the TabCAT-BHA demonstrated greater accuracy in detecting cognitive impairment (AUC = 75.3%) compared to the MMSE (AUC = 66.4%) and RUDAS (AUC = 71.4%). 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Remote Digital Cognitive Assessment in a Trial-Ready Alzheimer’s Cohort: A Scalable Approach for Early Intervention Studies

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) 2026-09-24

Average adherence was 41%. Despite this, remote measures demonstrated excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.90 after 10 sessions) and strong construct validity, with tasks loading onto memory, attention, and executive function domains. 5 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Prodromal cognitive disorder in Alzheimer's disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 1999-07-01

Patterns of cognitive impairment may be detected in cases of AD 2 years before formal clinical diagnosis, although high education level prolongs competence, principally on verbal tasks. 3 key findings →

Participants: 150 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Effects of the online computerized cognitive training program BEYNEX on the cognitive tests of individuals with subjective cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease on rivastigmine therapy

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Turkish journal of medical sciences 2020-02-13

This study is a rare example that focuses on both groups with SCI and AD. 2 key findings →

Participants: 60 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Correlation analysis between subtest scores of CERAD-K and a newly developed tablet computer-based digital cognitive test (Inbrain CST)

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 2023-06-29

This study demonstrates that the Inbrain CST is a reliable tool for detecting cognitive impairment in cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with MCI, because it has a high correlation and agreement with CERAD-K. Therefore, the Inbrain CST can be a useful, time-efficient, and cost-effective computer-based cognitive test for individuals at risk for cognitive impairment. 3 key findings →

Participants: 166 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

Utility of Diffusion Modeling of Cogstate Brief Battery Test Performance in Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Assessment 2022-01-11

Cognitive testing data are essential to the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and computerized cognitive testing, such as the Cogstate Brief Battery, has proven helpful in efficiently identifying harbingers of dementia. 2 key findings →

Participants: 257 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

The Geriatric Depression Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. A validity study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Nordic journal of psychiatry 2006-01-01

The study is a validation study of two psychogeriatric depression rating scales, The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). 4 key findings →

Participants: 36 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Age- and education-adjusted normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults age 70-99

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition 2015-05-05

The original validation study for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) suggests a cutoff score of 26; however, this may be too stringent for older adults, particularly for those with less education. 4 key findings →

Participants: 205 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Specific patterns of cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 1999-12-01

Eleven patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) were selected from an initial cohort of 43 patients. 4 key findings →

Participants: 43 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Schizophrenia and dementia across the lifespan: epidemiological links, cognitive trajectories, and the pathophysiological interplay

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Frontiers in Neurology 2026-04-07

Epidemiological studies consistently indicate a two- to threefold increased risk of dementia among individuals with schizophrenia, although estimates vary due to diagnostic and ascertainment biases. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Delineation of the cognitive and neuropsychiatric features of Pisa syndrome in dementia with Lewy bodies

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2025-11-19

Our study reveals that PS in DLB is associated with specific deficits in attention and visuospatial/executive function, alongside more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 35 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Neurology 1994-04-01

The neuropsychological tests developed for the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) are currently used to measure cognitive impairments of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in clinical investigations of this disorder.

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2021-07-20

There is a pressing need to capture and track subtle cognitive change at the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) rapidly, cost-effectively, and with high sensitivity. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

The assessment of cognitive function in advanced HIV-1 infection and AIDS dementia complex using a new computerised cognitive test battery

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 2005-12-15

The validity of a new computerised battery called CogState was determined in 60 individuals with advanced human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection from which eleven were assessed as AIDS dementia complex (ADC) stage 1 or 2. 1 key finding →

Participants: 60 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomized / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multicenter collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed    Where this research is being discussed: events