BCG vaccine has been used for 100 years to prevent tuberculosis. 3 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The concentration of 124 I-RmAb158-scFv8D3, as measured in vivo with PET, increased with age and corresponded well with the ex vivo autoradiography and Aβ immunohistochemistry results. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The construct of psychosis of dementia was validated, and the severity of both psychosis and aggressiveness was reduced with risperidone treatment in a robust and dose-related way, with a continuing response over the 12-week trial period. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Change detected by the MCI-CGIC was associated with baseline clinical severity and with change in clinical ratings over 6 and 12 months, supporting the validity of a CGIC approach in MCI. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent high-profile failures of Alzheimer disease treatments at the clinical trial stage have led to renewed efforts to identify and test novel interventions for Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although observational studies have identified modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of risk factor modification for ADRD prevention have been inconsistent or inconclusive. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Pomegranate juice (PGJ) is rich in unique bioactive compounds that can be used in the management of various diseases/disorders such as cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer disease, hypertension, and diabetes. 3 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Reduced bone mineral density and increased risk of falls are related with Alzheimer disease, and these increase likelihood of bone osteoporotic fractures causing serious complications such as disability, fear of falling, loss autonomy, decreased quality of life, and anticipated mortality in elderly patients. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We studied the validity of longitudinal statistical inferences of clinical trials using minimization, a dynamic randomization algorithm designed to minimize treatment imbalance for prognostic factors. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly disabling progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a steadily growing number of patients, by the absence of a cure for the disease and by great difficulties in diagnosing in the preclinical phase. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lithium salts have a well-established role in the treatment of major affective disorders. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
β-Site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) is one of the key enzymes involved in the processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and formation of amyloid β peptide (Aβ) species. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The authors sought to examine the impact of the K-variant of butyrylcholinesterase (BCHE-K) carrier status on age-at-diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) in APOE4 carriers. 4 key findings →
Design: post-hoc analysis Participants: 33 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We conducted an open-label study designed to assess the effects of tacrine on behavioral changes in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Due to the reduced variability in endpoints when using digital twins as covariates in statistical analyses, the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial could have enrolled up to 24% fewer control arm participants to draw the same conclusions about treatment efficacy as previously reported for the study's primary outcome, the integrated Alzheimer Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) at 18 months. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The MI group significantly improved in attention-executive functioning (p = 0.003) compared to ACI (Cohen's d: 0.47, 95% CI 0.13-0.79). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting for baseline scores via ANCOVA, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher post-intervention outcomes compared to the control group (p < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Participants: 58 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI) can affect several cognitive domains, including attention, working memory, executive functions, language, visuospatial skills, and episodic memory, resulting in a progressive reduction of autonomy and an increased risk of dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 23 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although a substantial proportion of TG participants achieved high MI accuracy values, statistical analyses revealed no cognitive improvements specific to TG, suggesting limited efficacy of the MI-based protocol compared to classical cognitive stimulation. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The MoCA score and the SCWT duration of the real group improved significantly compared with that of the sham group. 5 key findings →
Participants: 18 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Caregivers in the control conditions reported significantly worsening sleep efficiency whereas in comparison, those in the active conditions reported improving sleep efficiency. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In 6-month trials, measurement error makes a substantial contribution to the variance in ADAS-Cog change scores. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In this sample of older individuals, a higher dropout rate occurred in those assigned to the high-technology assessment techniques; however, once participants had completed baseline in all 3 arms, they continued participation through 1 month. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
41/100
Many insults, including trauma, ischemia, infection, inflammation, and neurodegeneration, result in irreversible damage to the central nervous system. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
From across this tag
9 of the 1,875 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 9. The same 9 appear here every time.
- Current Status of Clinical Trials on Tau Immunotherapies
- Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: a 24-week open-label study
- Improvement in executive function for older adults through smartphone apps: a randomized clinical trial comparing language learning and brain training
- Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Parkinson Disease: A randomized, placebo-controlled study
- A randomized trial of the impact of a specific care plan in 1120 Alzheimer's patients (PLASA Study) over a two-year period: design and baseline data
- Sulfopropanoic acid derivatives for treating neurodegenerative disorders: a patent spotlight
- Screening for deficits on intrinsic capacity domains and associated healthcare costs
- Effects of a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and cognitive training intervention in patients with Alzheimer's disease
- The effects of virtual reality and video conferencing on personal and relational well-being among older adults with cognitive impairments and their adult children: The Thrive randomized controlled trial
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →