Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 6,551–6,575 of 6,907 studies · tagged Brain Biology (page 263 of 277) · 28,180 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

A review of studies on vascular dementia and iron metabolism

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Science Progress 2025-10-01

Vascular dementia (VaD) is recognized as the second most prevalent form of dementia after Alzheimer's disease, with its pathogenesis intricately associated with cerebrovascular pathologies, including chronic hypoperfusion, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. 2 key findings →

Design: narrative review Evidence: low

In 2004, the first radiotracer that bound amyloid plaques was reported, which enabled visualization of the amount and regional distribution of amyloid plaques in the brains of living individuals via positron emission tomography (PET). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Cystatin C (CST3) colocalizes with amyloid-β (Aβ) around vessels in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Since the term limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) was coined in 2019, more than 200 articles addressing the subject were published. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

As the term limbic-predominant age-related transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) encephalopathy (LATE) was coined in 2019, more than 200 articles addressing the subject were published. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

According to the latest report in 2024 by the World Health Organization, based on global data from 2021, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other forms of dementia rank seventh among the leading causes of death worldwide, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Acupuncture ameliorated cognitive impairment in VD rats, reduced hippocampal neuronal damage and apoptosis, downregulated pro-apoptotic proteins (cleaved-caspase 3 and Bax), and upregulated anti-apoptotic Bcl-2. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

We recently confirmed and extended these findings using recombinant TauOs generated from full-length human tau in the presence of arachidonic acid (Balducci et al., 2025; Figure 1). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

2′-FL improved cognitive performance in 5xFAD mice, reduced Aβ plaque deposition and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in vivo , and mitigated oxidative stress and synaptic dysfunction in cellular models. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

The locus of the gene PTK2B encoding the tyrosine kinase Pyk2 has been associated with the risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, the predominant form of dementia. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Semantic dementia (SD) is a type of dementia characterized by a loss of semantic memory, typically presenting with left-predominant temporal lobe atrophy and a frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP) type C pathology. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

In AβO-injected mice, AR, particularly at 200 mg/kg, attenuated memory deficits, reduced hippocampal neuronal degeneration, preserved synaptic protein immunoreactivity and increased markers of hippocampal cell proliferation and immature neurons. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Beyond their role in energy production, mitochondria also interact with other organelles through forming membrane contacts that serve as central hubs of cellular metabolism and signaling. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Defective mitochondrial quality control is increasingly implicated in tau-mediated neurodegeneration, but how distinct tau lesions in different cell types interact with PINK1-PRKN-mediated mitophagy remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

A review on recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: The role of synaptic plasticity

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. AIMS neuroscience 2025-01-01

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) remains a significant global health challenge, characterized by progressive neurodegeneration and a decline in cognitive abilities such as memory and learning. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

This study offers evidence of functional and neuroprotective effects of two weeks treatment with a Ptychopetalum olacoides extract against Aβ peptide-induced neurotoxicity in mice. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Transmissible encephalopathies (TSEs), such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and scrapie, are caused by infectious agents that provoke strain-specific patterns of disease. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

The 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the APP gene, encompassing 147 base pairs between the transcriptional (+1) and the translational start site, was examined for its role in APP expression. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Soluble amyloid-beta in the brain: the scarlet pimpernel

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 2006-01-01

Researchers since the 1990s have predominantly focused on the amyloid hypothesis and the formation of amyloid fibrils as the culprit behind AD when we began working on soluble Abeta (sAbeta). 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Paired helical filaments (PHF), which constitute neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and neuritic plaque (NP) neurites, serve as a useful marker for Alzheimer disease (AD). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

The occurrence of +1 frameshifted proteins, such as amyloid precursor protein (APP+1) and ubiquitin-B (UBB+1) in Down syndrome (DS) has been linked to the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

BACH1/HO-1 axis dysregulation links Down syndrome to Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Neurochemistry international 2026-07-30

Down syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, is characterized by early-onset oxidative stress, impaired neuronal development, and an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-like neuropathology. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

From across this tag

10 of the 6,890 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed