Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives To study caregivers' decisions to end home care for relatives with dementia; to study the changes in caregiver functioning over time. Design A prospective longitudinal follow-up study. Setting Individual homes and chronic care facilities in Montreal. Participants 157 caregiver-dependent dyads, followed up 2 years later; dependents had been diagnosed as having progressive dementia. Measurements A standard interview and a series of standardized psychological questionnaires were given to caregivers, assessing their functioning and their appraisals of the dependent person in their care. Dependents received the Mini-Mental State Examination. Main results Caregivers cited patient deterioration as the most common reason for ending home care. Most caregivers did not prepare their relative before institutionalization. Most caregivers were satisfied with having ended home care and believed the decision was positive for themselves and their dependent, but a sizable minority of caregivers and dependents had difficulty adjusting to the end of home care. Repeated measures multivariate analyses indicated that caregivers who had discontinued home care because of placement or death of the dependent had improved functioning and quality of life and better health than caregivers still providing home care. Conclusions Caregivers most frequently cite deteriorating patient conditions as the main causes of ending home care. Caregiver exhaustion is the single most frequently given reason. Caregivers who were still providing home care at the end of the study were functioning less well than caregivers who had ended home care, despite having initially functioned at better levels.

Key findings

Why it matters

Caregivers who ended home care because of placement or death of their relative with dementia had improved functioning, quality of life, and health compared with those still providing home care. This concerns caregiver outcomes, not the treatment, cure, or prevention of dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 47 of 100.47 of 100 points earned53 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1995 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 127 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.8 citations a year over 33 year(s) since 1995
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 6 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author David Andrés: h-index 15 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Concordia University: institution h-index 503 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 7806732)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Gold, D. P., Reis, M. F., Markiewicz, D., & Andres, D. (1995). When home caregiving ends: a longitudinal study of outcomes for caregivers of relatives with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06235.x

Vancouver

Gold DP, Reis MF, Markiewicz D, Andres D. When home caregiving ends: a longitudinal study of outcomes for caregivers of relatives with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06235.x. PMID: 7806732.

BibTeX

@article{gold1995-7806732,
  author  = {Gold, D. P. and Reis, M. F. and Markiewicz, D. and Andres, D.},
  title   = {{When home caregiving ends: a longitudinal study of outcomes for caregivers of relatives with dementia}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {1995},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06235.x},
  pmid    = {7806732},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06235.x}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →