Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This study aims to investigate how cognitive impairment and social presence influence goal attainment in an ecological virtual environment. It also examines the role of interactive features in improving computer-assisted cognitive training for older adults, both with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). A virtual supermarket was used to simulate a realistic exploration task, incorporating social interactions and adaptive assistance strategies. Error analysis was conducted to identify performance patterns linked to cognitive profiles. Participants with MCI exhibited a significantly higher frequency of wandering and uncorrected orientation errors, compared to cognitively healthy older adults. While verbal support was beneficial in facilitating virtual task progress, it did not fully mitigate performance deficits in those with MCI. Additionally, all older participants, regardless of cognitive status, reported significantly lower perceptions of social presence compared to younger participants. Virtual environments constitute a promising tool for the assessment and enhancement of functional abilities in older adults with neurocognitive impairments. The integration of tailored cognitive training protocols and adaptive support strategies holds potential to optimize cognitive stimulation and task performance. • A computerized ecological task can demonstrate age-related neurocognitive decline. • Wandering and orientation errors characterize cognitive decline. • Older people with neurocognitive decline maintain a sens of social presence. • Virtual support is less effective for older individuals with cognitive disorders. • Tailored support for seniors must adapt verbal cues as part of virtual training.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used a virtual supermarket task and found that people with mild cognitive impairment made more wandering and orientation errors than cognitively healthy older adults, and that verbal support did not fully remove these deficits. It suggests virtual environments may be useful for assessment and cognitive training, but it does not test a treatment, cure or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (IRBM)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 IRBM: journal h-index 58 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Emmanuel Monfort: h-index 6 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: institution h-index 2,511 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Andrieu-Devilly, P.-A., Gandit, M., Schwab, D., Quillion‐Dupré, L., & Monfort, E. (2025). Unlocking Cognitive Potential: Exploring a Virtual Environment for Cognitive Training in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment. IRBM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100885

Vancouver

Andrieu-Devilly P.-A, Gandit M, Schwab D, Quillion‐Dupré L, Monfort E. Unlocking Cognitive Potential: Exploring a Virtual Environment for Cognitive Training in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment. IRBM. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100885.

BibTeX

@article{andrieudevilly2025-4e21a0da,
  author  = {Andrieu-Devilly, Pierre-Alexandre and Gandit, Marc and Schwab, Didier and Quillion‐Dupré, Lisa and Monfort, Emmanuel},
  title   = {{Unlocking Cognitive Potential: Exploring a Virtual Environment for Cognitive Training in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment}},
  journal = {IRBM},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100885},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100885}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →