Home › Research › Digital health tools
Transformer-based deep neural network language models for Alzheimer's disease risk assessment from targeted speech
Roshanzamir A, Aghajan H, Soleymani Baghshah M.. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021-03-09
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Background We developed transformer-based deep learning models based on natural language processing for early risk assessment of Alzheimer's disease from the picture description test. Methods The lack of large datasets poses the most important limitation for using complex models that do not require feature engineering. Transformer-based pre-trained deep language models have recently made a large leap in NLP research and application. These models are pre-trained on available large datasets to understand natural language texts appropriately, and are shown to subsequently perform well on classification tasks with small training sets. The overall classification model is a simple classifier on top of the pre-trained deep language model. Results The models are evaluated on picture description test transcripts of the Pitt corpus, which contains data of 170 AD patients with 257 interviews and 99 healthy controls with 243 interviews. The large bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT Large ) embedding with logistic regression classifier achieves classification accuracy of 88.08%, which improves the state-of-the-art by 2.48%. Conclusions Using pre-trained language models can improve AD prediction. This not only solves the problem of lack of sufficiently large datasets, but also reduces the need for expert-defined features.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Roshanzamir, A., Aghajan, H., & Soleymani Baghshah, M. (2021). Transformer-based deep neural network language models for Alzheimer's disease risk assessment from targeted speech. BMC medical informatics and decision making. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01456-3
Vancouver
Roshanzamir A, Aghajan H, Soleymani Baghshah M. Transformer-based deep neural network language models for Alzheimer's disease risk assessment from targeted speech. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2021. doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01456-3. PMID: 33750385.
BibTeX
@article{roshanzamir2021-33750385,
author = {Roshanzamir, A. and Aghajan, H. and Soleymani Baghshah, M.},
title = {{Transformer-based deep neural network language models for Alzheimer's disease risk assessment from targeted speech}},
journal = {BMC medical informatics and decision making},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1186/s12911-021-01456-3},
pmid = {33750385},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01456-3}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The overall classification model is a simple classifier on top of the pre-trained deep language model.
- Results The models are evaluated on picture description test transcripts of the Pitt corpus, which contains data of 170 AD patients with 257 interviews and 99 healthy controls with 243 interviews.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Effect size88.08%; 2.48%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 47/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC medical informatics and decision making) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33750385) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 27 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100. |
| Total | 47 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “convolutional”
205 studies in the library carry the topic tag “convolutional”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 205 tagged studies.