Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background The trajectory of dyspnea has been reported among patients approaching the end of life. However, patients near death have been dropped from longitudinal studies or excluded altogether because of an inability to self-report; proxy estimates have been reported. It is not known whether dyspnea or respiratory distress remains stable, escalates, or abates as patients reach last days. Objective Determine trajectory of dyspnea (self-reported) and respiratory distress (observed) among patients who were approaching death. Design A prospective, repeated-measures study of dyspnea/respiratory distress among a sample of hospice patients was done. Measures were collected at each patient encounter from hospice enrollment until patient death. Measurements Dyspnea was measured in response to "Are you short of breath?" and using the numeric rating scale anchored at 0 and 10. Nurses measured respiratory distress with the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS). Patient consciousness (Reaction Level Scale), nearness to death (Palliative Performance Scale), diagnoses, and demographics were recorded. Data for the 30-day interval before death were analyzed. Results The sample was 91 patients who were female (58%) and Caucasian (83%) with dementia (32%), heart failure (26%), and cancer (13%). RDOS increased significantly from mild distress 30 days before death to moderate/severe distress on the day of death (F = 10.8, p < 0.0001). Distress was strongly correlated with nearness to death (r = -0.97, p < 0.0001) and consciousness (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Respiratory distress escalated in the last days. Inability to self-report raises care concerns about under-recognition and under-treatment of respiratory distress.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 35 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 60 of 100. Total 60 of 100.35 of the 58 points we could judge = 60 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of palliative medicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 91 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 28817366)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 35 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100.
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Campbell, M. L., Kiernan, J. M., Strandmark, J., & Yarandi, H. N. (2018). Trajectory of Dyspnea and Respiratory Distress among Patients in the Last Month of Life. Journal of palliative medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0265

Vancouver

Campbell ML, Kiernan JM, Strandmark J, Yarandi HN. Trajectory of Dyspnea and Respiratory Distress among Patients in the Last Month of Life. Journal of palliative medicine. 2018. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0265. PMID: 28817366.

BibTeX

@article{campbell2018-28817366,
  author  = {Campbell, M. L. and Kiernan, J. M. and Strandmark, J. and Yarandi, H. N.},
  title   = {{Trajectory of Dyspnea and Respiratory Distress among Patients in the Last Month of Life}},
  journal = {Journal of palliative medicine},
  year    = {2018},
  doi     = {10.1089/jpm.2017.0265},
  pmid    = {28817366},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0265}
}

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →