Home › Research › Prevention trials
[Toward a preventive management Alzheimer's disease]
B Dubois, S Bombois, N Villain, M Teichmann, S Epelbaum, R Migliaccio, R Genthon, B Verrat et al.. Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine, 2020-04-21
Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety
Dementias, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in particular, will increasingly become a public health issue. However, three major data may change the severity of these pathologies: in young adults, simple measures of healthy lifestyle (control of vascular risk factors, physical activity and cognitive stimulation), have an impact on a future cognitive decline; the same lifestyle interventions may delay the start of the disease for elderly people potentially at-risk; finally, and for the first time, a monoclonal antibody directed against amyloid lesions has just shown a significant effect on the progression of AD in patients at an early stage of the disease. According to these results, we will have to reconsider the strategy for managing minor or severe cognitive disorders and particularly AD. Nowadays, patients start the care process too late. The solution is to act earlier, even preventively. It is necessary to improve a care offer adapted to this new situation in order to impact on the disease as soon as possible, even before the onset of symptoms, based on: 1) predictive algorithms aimed at establishing whose cognitively unimpaired individuals may further develop the disease; these algorithms will be based on demographic, family, cognitive, genomic and biological data, such as in the "Santé Cerveau" project developed in partnership with the Health Regional Agency (ARS) and the general practitioners; 2)and on some expert centers which must become "dementia prevention clinics" to test prevention measures, initiate and validate multi-domain therapeutic education programs; to disclose about the risk in response to the request of worried patients; and to propose early pharmacological treatments if these individuals are on the way to declare AD in the coming months, taking into account competition between risks. This will allow to prepare to make use of new pharmacological treatments that might be discovered.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Dubois, B., Bombois, S., Villain, N., Teichmann, M., Epelbaum, S., Migliaccio, R., et al. (2020). [Toward a preventive management Alzheimer's disease]. Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2020.04.012
Vancouver
Dubois B, Bombois S, Villain N, Teichmann M, Epelbaum S, Migliaccio R, et al. [Toward a preventive management Alzheimer's disease]. Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.banm.2020.04.012. PMID: 32322104.
BibTeX
@article{dubois2020-32322104,
author = {Dubois, B and Bombois, S and Villain, N and Teichmann, M and Epelbaum, S and Migliaccio, R and Genthon, R and Verrat, B and others},
title = {{[Toward a preventive management Alzheimer's disease]}},
journal = {Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1016/j.banm.2020.04.012},
pmid = {32322104},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2020.04.012}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- However, three major data may change the severity of these pathologies: in young adults, simple measures of healthy lifestyle (control of vascular risk factors, physical activity and cognitive stimulation), have an impact on a future cognitive decline; the same lifestyle interventions may delay the start of the disease for elderly people potentially at-risk; finally, and for the first time, a monoclonal antibody directed against amyloid lesions has just shown a significant effect on the progression of AD in patients at an early stage of the disease.
- According to these results, we will have to reconsider the strategy for managing minor or severe cognitive disorders and particularly AD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32322104) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Prevention trials
Also tagged “metabolic-syndrome”
304 studies in the library carry the topic tag “metabolic-syndrome”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 304 tagged studies.