Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 67 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Review of the evidence and recommendations are provided for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, fracture-risk assessment and intervention thresholds, management of vertebral fractures, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments, including duration and monitoring of anti-resorptive therapy, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, as well as models of care for fracture prevention. Recommendations are made for training, service leads and commissioners of healthcare, and for review criteria for audit and quality improvement. Specific 2024 updates include guidance on fracture risk assessment by ethnicity, Parkinson's disease, Down's syndrome and lower-limb amputation; furthermore, the definition of very high fracture risk has been clarified. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is now recommended as a first-line treatment option in younger postmenopausal women with high fracture risk and low baseline risk for adverse events; recommendations regarding abaloparatide are included; additional training resources have been added. The guideline provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment and management of osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management. This position paper has been endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Key findings

Why it matters

This guideline is about the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, not about Alzheimer's disease. It provides no information relevant to treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 67/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 64 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 67 of 100. Total 67 of 100.64 of the 96 points we could judge = 67 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 64 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 67 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Archives of Osteoporosis)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Archives of Osteoporosis: journal h-index 66 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 99 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 33.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 93.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 99 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 25 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40921943)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 64 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 64 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 67 out of 100.
Total 67 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Gregson, C. L., Armstrong, D., Avgerinou, C., Bowden, J., Cooper, C., Douglas, L., et al. (2025). The 2024 UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Archives of Osteoporosis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-025-01588-3

Vancouver

Gregson CL, Armstrong D, Avgerinou C, Bowden J, Cooper C, Douglas L, et al. The 2024 UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11657-025-01588-3. PMID: 40921943.

BibTeX

@article{gregson2025-40921943,
  author  = {Gregson, Celia Louise and Armstrong, David and Avgerinou, Christina and Bowden, Jean and Cooper, Cyrus and Douglas, Lucy and Edwards, John and Gittoes, Neil J. L. and others},
  title   = {{The 2024 UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis}},
  journal = {Archives of Osteoporosis},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s11657-025-01588-3},
  pmid    = {40921943},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-025-01588-3}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also in Prevention and risk

265 studies in the library are filed under Prevention and risk with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Prevention and risk hub.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →