Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Laboratory science

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Complement dysregulation is increasingly recognized in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the temporal profile of complement alterations preceding AD onset and their distinction from age-related immune changes remain poorly defined. Clarifying these dynamics could provide insights into AD pathogenesis and identify systemic factors that predict disease onset and progression. Methods We conducted a study involving two cohorts: a longitudinal cohort (n = 235; all cognitively normal at baseline) and a cross-sectional cohort (n = 323; including 53 with AD, 54 with vascular dementia, 51 with Parkinson's disease dementia, 56 with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, and 52 with dementia with Lewy bodies). Plasma levels of 14 complement factors were assessed every 2 years over a 10-year follow-up period in the longitudinal cohort and once in the cross-sectional cohort. Results In the longitudinal cohort, aging was accompanied by gradual reductions in C4, C4b, Factor I, and Properdin and by increases in Factor D. These changes were more pronounced in individuals who subsequently developed AD. Importantly, this pattern of complement alterations was detectable during the preclinical and clinical phases of AD but was not observed in other dementias. In the cross-sectional cohort, the same complement profile was specific to AD and distinguished it from other dementia subtypes. Conclusions The results of this study indicate an AD-specific peripheral complement signature associated with disease development, highlighting complement factors as critical immune mediators that link aging and AD. This signature implicates complement factors as promising systemic markers for early detection and potential therapeutic targeting in preclinical AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Fu, X., Cai, H., Quan, S., Zhang, W., Geng, Y., Tian, Q., et al. (2026). Systemic complement factors in aging, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a longitudinal study over 10 years. Molecular Neurodegeneration. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-026-00927-3

Vancouver

Fu X, Cai H, Quan S, Zhang W, Geng Y, Tian Q, et al. Systemic complement factors in aging, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a longitudinal study over 10 years. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2026. doi:10.1186/s13024-026-00927-3. PMID: 41526986.

BibTeX

@article{fu2026-41526986,
  author  = {Fu, X. and Cai, H. and Quan, S. and Zhang, W. and Geng, Y. and Tian, Q. and Ren, Z. and Xu, Y. and An, C. and Li, J. and Chu, C. and Wang, W. and others},
  title   = {{Systemic complement factors in aging, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a longitudinal study over 10 years}},
  journal = {Molecular Neurodegeneration},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1186/s13024-026-00927-3},
  pmid    = {41526986},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-026-00927-3}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Over 10 years, a specific pattern of complement protein changes in blood appeared more strongly in people who later developed Alzheimer's and was not seen in other dementias. This identifies possible predictive markers, but it does not show that measuring or altering these factors prevents or treats the disease.

Study details

Limitations

Measurements were made in peripheral plasma, which may not reflect complement activity in the brain unless blood-brain barrier integrity is compromised; causality cannot be inferred from observational data; and lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, smoking and alcohol that modulate immune function were not systematically included.

How this study scored 52/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 49 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 52 of 100. Total 52 of 100.49 of the 94 points we could judge = 52 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 49 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 52 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Molecular Neurodegeneration)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Molecular Neurodegeneration: journal h-index 164 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 558 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 14.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Longfei Jia holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Capital Medical University: institution h-index 643 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41526986)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 49 / 94 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 49 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 52 out of 100.
Total 52 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Laboratory science

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Laboratory science

See all studies in Laboratory science →