Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Delirium is common and often goes undetected in older patients admitted to medical services. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of delirium in older patients admitted to a general medical service could reduce time to improvement in cognitive status. Methods Consecutive patients aged 65 or more who were newly admitted to 5 general medical units between Mar. 15, 1996, and Jan. 31, 1999, were screened with the Confusion Assessment Method within 24 hours after admission to detect prevalent delirium and rescreened within a week to detect incident cases.

Key findings

Why it matters

This randomized trial tested whether systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of delirium in older medical inpatients could reduce time to improvement in cognitive status. The provided text does not report the trial's results, so no conclusion can be drawn about whether this approach helps cognition.

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 50 of the 92 points it could be judged on, which is 54 of 100. Total 54 of 100.50 of the 92 points we could judge = 54 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and senior author's track record, so those were left out: it earned 50 of the 92 points we could judge it on, which is 54 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2002 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 3 / 4 1,925 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 297 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 11.4 citations a year over 26 year(s) since 2002
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Johanne Laplante holds only 8 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 McGill University: institution h-index 1,373 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12389836)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 50 / 92 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 50 of the 92 points we could judge it on is 54 out of 100.
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Cole, M. G., McCusker, J., Bellavance, F., Primeau, F. J., Bailey, R. F., Bonnycastle, M. J., et al. (2002). Systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of delirium in older medical inpatients: a randomized trial. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

Vancouver

Cole MG, McCusker J, Bellavance F, Primeau FJ, Bailey RF, Bonnycastle MJ, et al. Systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of delirium in older medical inpatients: a randomized trial. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2002. PMID: 12389836.

BibTeX

@article{cole2002-12389836,
  author  = {Cole, M. G. and McCusker, J. and Bellavance, F. and Primeau, F. J. and Bailey, R. F. and Bonnycastle, M. J. and Laplante, J.},
  title   = {{Systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of delirium in older medical inpatients: a randomized trial}},
  journal = {CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne},
  year    = {2002},
  pmid    = {12389836}
}

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →