Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The analysis yielded three categories and nine subcategories describing surrogate decision-making practices regarding end-of-life care for people with dementia: (a) typical circumstances of end-of-life care planning, (b) expected roles of key personnel and related challenges and (c) important considerations. Participants discussed available treatment options within long-term care hospitals and the potential transfers to acute care hospitals during admission and periods of health decline. Physicians typically led such end-of-life care planning, with nurses playing a supportive role and family members making the final decisions. However, they faced challenges in performing their roles. In end-of-life care discussions, participants weighed the patients' autonomy and best interests alongside family members' interests and other external concerns such as potential lawsuits and insufficient medical resources. Surrogate decision-making regarding end-of-life care in the context of dementia within long-term care hospitals is considerably complex and challenging for healthcare providers, requiring multifaceted institution-sensitive support. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The study findings suggest the need for targeted education and training to enhance healthcare providers' competencies in end-of-life care discussions, advance care planning and the development of policies and regulations supporting end-of-life care-related practices within long-term care hospitals. REPORTING

Key findings

Why it matters

This qualitative study describes how decisions about end-of-life care are made for people with dementia in long-term care hospitals, and finds the process complex and challenging for staff. It does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Advanced Nursing)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of Advanced Nursing: journal h-index 262 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Sang Suk Kim: h-index 24 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Chung-Ang University: institution h-index 325 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40814012)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kim, H., Cho, J., Park, J., & Kim, S. S. (2025). Surrogate Decision‐Making Practices Regarding End‐of‐Life Care for People With Dementia in Long‐Term Care Hospitals: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70136

Vancouver

Kim H, Cho J, Park J, Kim SS. Surrogate Decision‐Making Practices Regarding End‐of‐Life Care for People With Dementia in Long‐Term Care Hospitals: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2025. doi:10.1111/jan.70136. PMID: 40814012.

BibTeX

@article{kim2025-40814012,
  author  = {Kim, Hyejin and Cho, Jeonghyun and Park, Jongsun and Kim, Sang Suk},
  title   = {{Surrogate Decision‐Making Practices Regarding End‐of‐Life Care for People With Dementia in Long‐Term Care Hospitals: A Qualitative Descriptive Study}},
  journal = {Journal of Advanced Nursing},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1111/jan.70136},
  pmid    = {40814012},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70136}
}

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →