Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The effect of austerity and associated budgets are strong contenders,3Ruckert A Labonté R Health inequities in the age of austerity: the need for social protection policies.Soc Sci Med. 2017; 187: 306-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar, 4Hiam L Harrison D McKee M Dorling D Why is life expectancy in England and Wales ‘stalling’?.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018; 72: 359-360Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar although international parallels in the experiences of the UK possibly weaken arguments as to any significant causal role played by austerity.5Raleigh VS Stalling life expectancy in the UK.BMJ. 2018; 362k4050Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar For infant mortality, however, clear evidence exists that austerity is having an effect.6Taylor-Robinson D Lai E Wickham S et al.Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000–2017: time trend analysis.BMJ Open. 2019; 9e029424Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar In The Lancet Public Health, David Leon and colleagues7Leon DA Jdanov DA Shkolnikov VM Trends in life expectancy and age-specific mortality in England and Wales, 1970–2016, in comparison with a set of 22 high-income countries: an analysis of vital statistics data.Lancet Public Health. 2019; 4: e575-e582Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar provide a telling contribution to these debates, particularly in unpacking what is unique about the UK relative to other high-income countries. Examining neighbourhood effects over the life course suggests that where you have been and are currently living underpins these developing inequalities.11Jivraj S Norman P Nicholas O Murray E Are there sensitive neighbourhood effect periods during the life course on midlife health and wellbeing?.Health Place. 2019; 57: 147-156Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar The picking apart of mortality by age group and cause by Leon and colleagues is a key contribution to the evidence base. Indeed, the authors' concluding concern as to whether sufficient environmental or political stability exists to support such gains only serves to underline the importance of further research into the drivers of faltering life expectancy.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper discusses stalling life expectancy and increased mortality in working ages, noting that austerity and associated budgets are strong contenders for the effect. It also notes that examining neighbourhood effects over the life course suggests that where you have been and are currently living underpins developing inequalities.

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 36 of 100.36 of 100 points earned64 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (The Lancet Public Health)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 The Lancet Public Health: journal h-index 155 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.8 citations a year over 9 year(s) since 2019
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Paul D Norman: h-index 49 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Liverpool: institution h-index 995 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31677771)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Darlington‐Pollock, F., & Norman, P. D. (2019). Stalling life expectancy and increased mortality in working ages deserve urgent attention. The Lancet Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30207-5

Vancouver

Darlington‐Pollock F, Norman PD. Stalling life expectancy and increased mortality in working ages deserve urgent attention. The Lancet Public Health. 2019. doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30207-5. PMID: 31677771.

BibTeX

@article{darlingtonpollock2019-31677771,
  author  = {Darlington‐Pollock, Frances and Norman, Paul D},
  title   = {{Stalling life expectancy and increased mortality in working ages deserve urgent attention}},
  journal = {The Lancet Public Health},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30207-5},
  pmid    = {31677771},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30207-5}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →