Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

A total of 43 trials of 327,264 participants with 42,016 major adverse cardiovascular events where included. Remnant cholesterol was reduced 0.19 mmol/L per 1 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction, and 11% per 20% LDL cholesterol reduction. Fixed/random effects risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) for major adverse cardiovascular events per 1 mmol/L reductions were 0.84 (0.82-0.85)/0.82 (0.78-0.85) for LDL and 0.36 (0.33-0.40)/0.27 (0.20-0.36) for remnant cholesterol. Corresponding, estimates per 1 standard deviation reductions were 0.93 (0.92-0.93)/0.91 (0.90-0.93) and 0.92 (0.92-0.93)/0.90 (0.88-0.92), respectively. Fixed/random effects risk ratios per 1 mmol/L reductions were 0.88 (0.85-0.91)/0.82 (0.74-0.91) for LDL cholesterol adjusted for remnant cholesterol reductions and 0.74 (0.60-0.92)/0.92 (0.45-1.187) for remnant cholesterol adjusted for LDL cholesterol reductions. Corresponding estimates per 1 standard deviation reductions were 0.94 (0.93-0.96)/0.92 (0.88-0.96) and 0.98 (0.96-0.99)/0.99 (0.94-1.05), respectively. Remnant cholesterol lowering is associated with part of the cardiovascular risk reduction in statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitor trials.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Nordestgaard, A. T., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2025). Remnant cholesterol lowering in cardiovascular disease risk reduction in statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitor trials: meta-regression analyses. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf337

Vancouver

Nordestgaard AT, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol lowering in cardiovascular disease risk reduction in statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitor trials: meta-regression analyses. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2025. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf337. PMID: 40504878.

BibTeX

@article{nordestgaard2025-40504878,
  author  = {Nordestgaard, Ask Tybjærg and Nordestgaard, Børge Grønne},
  title   = {{Remnant cholesterol lowering in cardiovascular disease risk reduction in statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitor trials: meta-regression analyses}},
  journal = {European Journal of Preventive Cardiology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf337},
  pmid    = {40504878},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf337}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This meta-regression is about cholesterol lowering and cardiovascular events, not Alzheimer's disease, and reports no findings on dementia. It found that lowering remnant cholesterol was associated with part of the cardiovascular risk reduction seen in statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitor trials.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European Journal of Preventive Cardiology)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 European Journal of Preventive Cardiology: journal h-index 133 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,000 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 18 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 18 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Børge Grønne Nordestgaard: h-index 191 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Copenhagen: institution h-index 1,378 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40504878)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →