Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Considerable evidence is mounting that dyshomeostasis of the redox-active biometals, Cu and Fe, and oxidative stress contribute to the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Present data suggest that metals can interact directly with Abeta peptide, the principal component of beta-amyloid that is one of the primary lesions in AD. The binding of metals to Abeta modulates several physiochemical properties of Abeta that are thought to be central to the pathogenicity of the peptide. First, we and others have shown that metals can promote the in vitro aggregation into tinctorial Abeta amyloid. Studies have confirmed that insoluble amyloid plaques in postmortem AD brain are abnormally enriched in Cu, Fe, and Zn. Conversely, metal chelators dissolve these proteinaceous deposits from postmortem AD brain tissue and attenuate cerebral Abeta amyloid burden in APP transgenic mouse models of AD. Second, we have demonstrated that redox-active Cu(II) and, to a lesser extent, Fe(III) are reduced in the presence of Abeta with concomitant production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and hydroxyl radical (OH*). These Abeta/metal redox reactions, which are silenced by redox-inert Zn(II), but exacerbated by biological reducing agents, may lead directly to the widespread oxidation damages observed in AD brains. Moreover, studies have also shown that H(2)O(2) mediates Abeta cellular toxicity and increases the production of both Abeta and amyloid precursor protein (APP). Third, the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of APP mRNA has a functional iron-response element (IRE), which is consistent with biochemical evidence that APP is a redox-active metalloprotein. Hence, the redox interactions between Abeta, APP, and metals may be at the heart of a pathological positive feedback system wherein Abeta amyloidosis and oxidative stress promote each other. The emergence of redox-active metals as key players in AD pathogenesis strongly argues that amyloid-specific metal-complexing agents and antioxidants be investigated as possible disease-modifying agents for treating this horrible disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Huang, X., Moir, R. D., Tanzi, R. E., Bush, A. I., & Rogers, J. T. (2004). Redox-active metals, oxidative stress, and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1306.012

Vancouver

Huang X, Moir RD, Tanzi RE, Bush AI, Rogers JT. Redox-active metals, oxidative stress, and Alzheimer's disease pathology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004. doi:10.1196/annals.1306.012. PMID: 15105262.

BibTeX

@article{huang2004-15105262,
  author  = {Huang, X. and Moir, R. D. and Tanzi, R. E. and Bush, A. I. and Rogers, J. T.},
  title   = {{Redox-active metals, oxidative stress, and Alzheimer's disease pathology}},
  journal = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences},
  year    = {2004},
  doi     = {10.1196/annals.1306.012},
  pmid    = {15105262},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1306.012}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 21 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 36 of 100. Total 36 of 100.21 of the 58 points we could judge = 36 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2004 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15105262)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 21 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also tagged “metals”

4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “metals”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →